+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Great 5.3 tech article in Super Chevy

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    17

    Great 5.3 tech article in Super Chevy

    Hey guys,

    I received my latest Super Chevy Magazine in the mail yesterday and thumbed through it to find a great tech article on the 5.3 truck motor.

    I am new to this forum but am on several others. I bought a 2001 short cab step side about 4 months ago with the 5.3 and I love it.

    The article impressed me!! They took a junkyard 5.3 they bought for $800.00 and put it on a dyno to get base numbers. Completely stock with long tube headers and factory tune (no accessories on the front), they got 345 horsepower!!

    With a tune, they got 357 HP. They did a mild cam swap and added a set of Edelbrodk heads and got around 440 HP!!

    They spoke very highly of the little LS and acted surprised themselves.

    There was a comment in the article I want to confirm with you guys. They said an iron block 5.3 could be bored to a 5.7. Is this true??

    Anyway, worth reading.

    PS: I have a big block Camaro......I think I've been hotrodding the wrong vehicle!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Yes, it can be bored to a 5.7 without any problems. BTW, the numbers they're quoting are hypothetical engine HP numbers with correction factors. Almost all the numbers you'll see posted on here are rear wheel HP numbers. Go to the front page of the website and check out the article where Nelson Performance did a cam, headers and tune and gained 100 RWHP on a 5.3L engine.

    http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/front...html#post99130

    Pacesetter headers and ypipe: $400

    Custom cam kit: $690

    Performance tune: $375

    Flowmaster muffler: $50
    Last edited by RedHeartbeat; 08-22-2008 at 09:03 AM.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    17
    Yes, I understand the dyno differences.

    However, the exact same engine can net different results at the wheels in different vehicles. HP at the wheels is a more "real world" number I'll give you that. (I've also seen ~100 HP deltas in different chassis dynos on the same vehicle).

    I read the entire Nelson write-up on this site regarding the 100 HP increase and thought it was extremely informative.

    Anyway, I was just pointing out the small gain in respect for the little 5.3 LS motor the article in Super Chevy might garner. These motors are very common and relatively cheap when compared to an LS1. If they will go to 5.7 as you indicated, it would make a good base for a cheap hotrod engine.

    The only hang-up I'm having on modding my truck is the weight.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Weight is truly our nemisis and we have to learn to deal with it otherwise we'd all be doing RX7/LS1 conversions.

    To make a truck run in the 10s in the 1/4mile takes us a whole lot more TQ/HP than say a Mustang. It does my heart good to see a 5000 lb truck wasting a lightweight vehicle like a Mustang with mods.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,229
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    Weight is truly our nemisis and we have to learn to deal with it otherwise we'd all be doing RX7/LS1 conversions.

    To make a truck run in the 10s in the 1/4mile takes us a whole lot more TQ/HP than say a Mustang. It does my heart good to see a 5000 lb truck wasting a lightweight vehicle like a Mustang with mods.
    Amen sister.
    Gone, but not forgotten!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    17
    That's why I like this site. Making a truck fast is interesting. I like to see what you guys will come up with next. Some of you are pretty innovative.

    Rather than waste a lightweight car, I think it would be pretty cool to outrun a Ford Lightning every once in a while. Some (not all) of those guys are so arrogant.

    Anyway, Y'all got me fired up to do a few bolt-on mods to my truck.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    connecticut
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    Weight is truly our nemisis and we have to use the Force and destroy all who oppose us! With the LS motor on our side, we shall conquer this universe and all rice within it
    ..greg, your so funny,lol
    02' silverado ext. cb 2wd , 5.3 liter 325c.i. LM7, ported and polished throttlebody with bypass, Jannetty Racing 87 octane dyno tune, cold air intake with custom ram air, Heavy duty built 4l60e with vette servo, Z-pac clutches, "The Beast" Sunshell, transgo shift kit, yukon 4.10 gears with true trac, custom exhaust with Moroso Spiralflow, no cats, MSD 8.5 race wires, NGK TR55's
    Quote Originally Posted by farmtruc View Post
    Damn dude, take it easy on yourself during personal wacky time lol.
    Sometimes it can get out of hand
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    Satan just called - hell froze over.
    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    I take it like a virgin on prom night... I'm not happy, it hurts, but at the same time, I'm too drunk to care.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by yellowdemon327 View Post
    ..greg, your so funny,lol
    I love it!! I think a salad every once in a while would help me more than anything!! On second thought nitrous or a turbo would be easier!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    931
    Quote Originally Posted by Olddog View Post
    Yes, I understand the dyno differences.

    However, the exact same engine can net different results at the wheels in different vehicles. HP at the wheels is a more "real world" number I'll give you that. (I've also seen ~100 HP deltas in different chassis dynos on the same vehicle).

    I read the entire Nelson write-up on this site regarding the 100 HP increase and thought it was extremely informative.

    Anyway, I was just pointing out the small gain in respect for the little 5.3 LS motor the article in Super Chevy might garner. These motors are very common and relatively cheap when compared to an LS1. If they will go to 5.7 as you indicated, it would make a good base for a cheap hotrod engine.

    The only hang-up I'm having on modding my truck is the weight.

    We have several 5.3's on this site running very good numbers.. I would go so far as to say we have a few standard bore 5.3's that any hotrodder would be proud to drop in their machine.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    17
    Sorry, didn't mean that the way it came out. I agree the 5.3 would make a good hotrod motor with a standard bore. In fact, I would go so far to say it would probably make an even better forced induction motor because of the increased deck area for cylinder head sealing purposes.

    It seems now, to a lot of hotrodders, more cubes are better. Even the LS1 is too small to mess with for some of those guys. The L92 and similar square port heads are all the rage now and they will only bolt up to 4 inch bores and bigger. The smaller bore motors are kinda getting dissed.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts