+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Noticable difference between 5.3 and 6.0?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    Quote Originally Posted by casey23 View Post
    i was kidding... I just wouldnt take out a 5.3 in a stock truck and drop in a stock 6.0 and expect alot .... but gains are great with tune,headers,camshaft.... cubic inch is allways king.... put a 232/236 in there while you have it out
    I THINK ILL FEEL A PRETTY GOOD DIFFERENCE JUST SWAPPING STOCK MOTORS,,295HP TO 407HP,,AND A CAM ON TOP OF THAT LOL

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    hot & windy
    Posts
    1,117
    that's about like me going from the 4.3 to the 5.3
    00 FRC - just top end, exhaust, and a hot-air intake
    99 Sierra - 5.3 / 5spd
    ↓ click the pic for the build ↓

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    Quote Originally Posted by STUNNA View Post
    I THINK ILL FEEL A PRETTY GOOD DIFFERENCE JUST SWAPPING STOCK MOTORS,,295HP TO 407HP,,AND A CAM ON TOP OF THAT LOL
    .7L of displacement vs 1.3L. Like zebra said. Like a 4.3 to a 6.0.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Council Bluffs, Iowa
    Posts
    246
    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    .7L of displacement vs 1.3L. Like zebra said. Like a 4.3 to a 6.0.
    Or think of it this way.......

    The old 3.8 V6 from Olds/Buick cars is almost the same as a 5.0 V8 with 2 fewer cylinders.

    3.8 = .6333333 L per cylinder
    5.0 = .625 L per cylinder

    So, if you can imagine the difference between those 2 motors, that's roughly the difference an extra 1.2L makes. Not exactly, mind you, just a point for comparison.

    The 1.2L difference in going from a V6 to a V8 in my comparison would actually be a bit less dramatic than a 1.2L larger V8......because in the V6 to V8 scenario, part of the HP increase will also be absorbed by the larger rotating mass of the extra 2 cylinders. You will probably add rotating mass with a larger V8 as well (larger pistons), but not as much as 2 whole extra cylinders' worth. One way to get around, or at least somewhat mitigate the increased rotating mass issue is to use lightweight forged pistons in the larger motor. That of course requires rebalancing of the whole rotating assembly, yadda yadda yadda.

    '02 Avalanche 1500 Z-71, BFG All-Terrains, K&N FIPK, Superchips tuner (Nelson eventually), 750-watt Alpine stereo W/ JL midgate Stealthbox.
    '88 Mustang GT, 400HP on motor, T-56 6-speed, 3.73s, 150HP NOS
    '89 K5 Blazer 1500, blown motor and transmission. Another project some year.
    '95 Polaris 600XCR snowmobile, pipes, heads, bored carbs.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalBoy0101 View Post
    Or think of it this way.......

    The old 3.8 V6 from Olds/Buick cars is almost the same as a 5.0 V8 with 2 fewer cylinders.

    3.8 = .6333333 L per cylinder
    5.0 = .625 L per cylinder

    So, if you can imagine the difference between those 2 motors, that's roughly the difference an extra 1.2L makes. Not exactly, mind you, just a point for comparison.

    The 1.2L difference in going from a V6 to a V8 in my comparison would actually be a bit less dramatic than a 1.2L larger V8......because in the V6 to V8 scenario, part of the HP increase will also be absorbed by the larger rotating mass of the extra 2 cylinders. You will probably add rotating mass with a larger V8 as well (larger pistons), but not as much as 2 whole extra cylinders' worth. One way to get around, or at least somewhat mitigate the increased rotating mass issue is to use lightweight forged pistons in the larger motor. That of course requires rebalancing of the whole rotating assembly, yadda yadda yadda.

    Yeah... Thats what I said. lol

    Edit: Does anyone know where I got 1.3L? looking back now, I cant remember. ROFL.
    Last edited by pl4yboy; 09-09-2009 at 03:04 AM.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Council Bluffs, Iowa
    Posts
    246
    Quote Originally Posted by pl4yboy View Post
    Yeah... Thats what I said. lol

    Edit: Does anyone know where I got 1.3L? looking back now, I cant remember. ROFL.
    No.......I thought you figured something out I didn't easily see, why i ran with the 1.3L number you threw out LOL.

    5.3L + 1.3L = 6.6L? Isn't one of the new Corvette motors a 6.6?

    '02 Avalanche 1500 Z-71, BFG All-Terrains, K&N FIPK, Superchips tuner (Nelson eventually), 750-watt Alpine stereo W/ JL midgate Stealthbox.
    '88 Mustang GT, 400HP on motor, T-56 6-speed, 3.73s, 150HP NOS
    '89 K5 Blazer 1500, blown motor and transmission. Another project some year.
    '95 Polaris 600XCR snowmobile, pipes, heads, bored carbs.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by WARLOCK View Post
    Will I need injectors like you have? The cam listed above is close to yours right?


    i'd get bigger injectors just to be on the safe side ! 42's are really cheap now days
    Simple: 408 on steroids!
    single digits coming soon!

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crossett,Ar
    Posts
    2,382
    If you are only looking for a 13 you can keep what you have and mod it, BUT like everyone once you get to a goal you will set another... So your 13 will become a 12... and so on. I vote save your wallet later down the road and go 6.0 I still wish I did!

    06 Intimidator SS- Tuned, CAI -DD
    03 Silverado- Last incarnation 13.6... RIP
    Ls1, Pnp heads, Polluter camshaft, spray, 4k stall on the way
    "Seize the day like you seize your noodle" - Shin Chan

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    maine
    Posts
    1,458
    im in the same boat, im working on getting a 2004 lq9 6.0 out of a ss truck with 44k miles. trying to get it for $1200. should be a nice step up from the 5.3 maybe get a nice set of l92 heads and raunchy cam with a decent shot of nitrous. with a 6 speed manual if i cant destroy all of 3rd gear and some of 4th with my 20's ill be very surprised. ill keep you posted.
    09 CREWCAB LTZ SILVERADO, 6.2, SIX SPEED, CAI,

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    going from a stock cammed 5.3 to a stock cammed 5.7 i went from 13.88 to 13.26.

    yes you will feel a difference.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts