+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: vortec 8.1L 496ci VS. vortec 7.4L 454ci

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    137

    vortec 8.1L 496ci VS. vortec 7.4L 454ci

    so the 496 has less aftermarket, but more base line power, the 454 has a little less power but a bigger aftermarket. the 454 is more expensive, but only by a little, and the 8.1L uses more fuel. so there are plenty of pros and cons either way, what would you prefer?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    how about a 502? A very good engine with great aftermarket following and affordably priced for what you get.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    how about a 502? A very good engine with great aftermarket following and affordably priced for what you get.
    i was more saying between the two, what would you rather, but yeah, a 502ci would be nice...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    A well built 454 with a good set of ported heads would be a great engine. The 454 engine is a staple of the HD towing world but seems to have a mish-mash of low performing parts in the late model vehicles. A good RV cam would be a plus, too. The 496 is cool in its own way but I'd steer clear considering how easy a 6.2L swap could be.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    A well built 454 with a good set of ported heads would be a great engine. The 454 engine is a staple of the HD towing world but seems to have a mish-mash of low performing parts in the late model vehicles. A good RV cam would be a plus, too. The 496 is cool in its own way but I'd steer clear considering how easy a 6.2L swap could be.
    true....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    30
    In my experience an 8.1 does the same on fuel, so you can take that out. None of them are going to get better than 12 without a lot of very careful driving in a very light truck so I wouldn't worry myself about that.

    The 8.1 has a lot of potential but it's limited by the throttle body. They just can't flow enough air to support the higher RPM. Also, the marine world has tons of horsepower parts but they say marine so they cost more, a lot more. They're a great motor if you leave them stock, with maybe a cam that emphasizes the low-end. But they can put a serious drain in your wallet if you get into them.

    If I did a 454 I'd actually go back to a carb. The 96+ vortec doesn't make that great of power, and the tbi's are anemic. I'd build a vortec one and put a good sized carb on it myself.
    88 RCLB: LS swap in progress
    00 CCLB
    03 Yukon Denali: Wife's "soccer mom mobile"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    dfDUB
    Posts
    38
    How are you saying that the 496 has less aftermarket available than the 454? They are both BBC...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Stafford, VA
    Posts
    255
    Just get this block as a basis and call it a day ... can anyone say 763ci?
    - Paul J.
    2006 Silverado LT3 L33 Z71 - Mods: K&N Air Filter; Taylor Wires
    2008 Azera Limited - Mods: (Yah, wife's car ... not happening)
    (SOLD) 1994 Camaro Z28 - Mods: (Too many to mention)
    (SOLD) 2004 Suburban 5.3L Z71 - Mods: Flex-a-Lite 292 Monster Fan
    (SOLD) 2000 Silverado 5.3L Z71 - Mods: (NTIKO)
    (SOLD) 1991 Suburban 350 2WD - Mods: (NTIKO)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts