+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: 4.8 vs. 5.3, same truck and gearing...?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    117

    4.8 vs. 5.3, same truck and gearing...?

    wondering if anyone has ever had the same truck and same gearing but went from the 4.8 to 5.3 and if so, was there that much of a difference? I see the HP and torque numbers arent that far apart so wondering if there is much seat of the pants difference, stock against stock..iM ASKING BECAUSE I HAVE A 1999 ECSB 4X4 WITH 4.8 AND WHEN ITS SHOT I WAS GOING TO REPLACE WITH A 5.3 BUT IF NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE I WONT WORRY ABOUT WICH ONE I REPLACE IT WITH. nOT GOING 6.0 as it uses more gas and im not needing that much power, not racing or anything. sorry about the caps, computer flipping out.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    Don't let the numbers throw you I have seen plenty of 5.3 and 6.0s get better mileage than the 4.8s. The seat of the pants going from 4.8 to 5.3 wont be huge, but with a proper tune some simple boltons and a baby cam you could get great mileage and have your power too.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    San Antonio TX
    Posts
    1,150
    Yup get a 5.3. Ive driven both 07 rcsb 4.8 and 5.3 and i wish my truck had a 5.3


    4.8, TSP 220, 6L90 swap, 3400 Stall, 4.10s w/30" drag radial and T76 @ 16lbs.
    Best ET 11.54@114 w 1.52 60ft
    Raceweight 4905 lbs.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    911
    I'd go 6.0 if you could find one. I went from a 4.3 to a LS6 5.7 and am getting the same fuel mileage as the 4.3. And that's with no MAF and the fuel trims at +20%. Something is frigged up with my tune or MAF, won't run worth a crap with it plugged in for some reason.
    2000 Chevy Silverado RCSB LS6 5 speed, LS6 short block, 317 heads, LS6 intake, Lunati 220/224 .575/.575 112LSA cam, Edelbrock Headers, CTS-V accessory drive, Nelson Performance Custom Tune.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    117
    well, i kinda would like to go from the 4.8 to the 6.0 but afraid of the mileage. I know in this big extended cab 4x4 the 5.3 will get better mileage than the 4.8, but afraid the big 6.0 may get worse than the 4.8..? Also, i want the swap to be as cheap and painless as possble and dont you need more stuff to use the 6.0 than the 5.3, stuff like modding some of the wiring and different injectors or stuff?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    San Antonio TX
    Posts
    1,150
    As long as its the same year everyrhing should swap over. They are the same externally its the rotating assembly that changes.


    4.8, TSP 220, 6L90 swap, 3400 Stall, 4.10s w/30" drag radial and T76 @ 16lbs.
    Best ET 11.54@114 w 1.52 60ft
    Raceweight 4905 lbs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    99 and some 2000s. If it has a flat flex plate it has the long crank snout. Some had a spacer you could remove but never trust that it's removable. If it has a flat flex plate, move on unless you're going to an older 80e or it comes with an 80e.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    99 and some 2000s. If it has a flat flex plate it has the long crank snout. Some had a spacer you could remove but never trust that it's removable. If it has a flat flex plate, move on unless you're going to an older 80e or it comes with an 80e.
    are you saying the 1999-2000 are the ones i want or the ones to avoid?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ponca City
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by mopower440 View Post
    are you saying the 1999-2000 are the ones i want or the ones to avoid?
    yea if possible
    Slowest in Oklahoma...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    117
    so ive been doing some more reading on this swap and its getting more complicated, not only did the early 6.0's have a longer crank, but so did the 4.8 and 5.3 also! My truck is a 1999 so the 4.8 in it is going to have the long crank, meaning the flexplate in it wont work with the 6.0...

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts