Okay, if thats the way you feel, go get a 4" pipe bent at an exhaust shop.. At the bend, it may cut it down to as small as 3". Just go get a 3" pipe and put it on there. It'll flow the same as the 4" with the 3" bend.
I guess you want to tell me porting and polishing heads and throttle bodies does nothing too. Why does an ORY flow better than a stock Y? It's mandrel bent. No restriction.
1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4
I still have a couple of UPD CAI for sale. $200 shipped with AFe air filter. See pics in the for sale section.
67 Camaro SS 350 and a 67 Camaro back half car
99 Z28 Camaro (Old motor - 585rwhp / 602 rwtq)
97 Nissan Maxima
00 Chevy Tahoe
21 Model T Roadster Pickup
65 FFR Shelby Cobra w/501ci BBF
57 Willys CJ5 Jeep
MD250 Mustang Dyno - EFI live
Yeah bro that was an absurd statement up above. Not trying to bust balls or anything. Any restriction to the tubing is going to be a detriment to performance, which is of course why you go through the trouble of installing an aftermarket cai in the first place. Same goes for the exhaust
You're missing my point though. You can put a 400" intake tube on there but the throttle body is the main restriction. If you're going to an exhaust shop to have a tube bent, wouldn't they be able to do mandrel bending?
Porting can make or break an engine. You're comparing apples and oranges here. Also with porting, a smaller port can flow better than a larger port. Major apples and oranges there so I'm not sure why you even brought that up since we're talking about an intake tube.
Last edited by Toadz; 10-08-2009 at 05:36 PM.
2000 GMC Sierra 5.3L 4x4 ECSB
You're making a moot point regardless. Your TB might be able to allow more air than you'd be getting with an exhaust shop intake tube. So you, sir, are comparing apples to oranges. The point was that the opening and clearing of passages allows more airflow period. I guess we're just on different levels...
1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4
well unfortunately, I didnt bring up porting. That was Pl4yboy. But regardless, I stand behind what he stated about porting, and all the rest of it, too. Ask any of these highly modded truck owners in here whether or not a direct and/or UNOBSTRUCTED airflow path through the engine matters. I suspect you may wind up on the receiving end of a resounding YES. Not trying to argue with you, but the proof is in the puddin. Thank you, and God bless America.
No, I believe we're on the same level but I think we completely misunderstood each other. Okay, so the point was that the opening and clearing of passages allows more airflow, period. Then I agree. Let's end it at that, haha.
Sorry the porting comment wasn't directed towards you. What do you mean you stand behind what he stated about porting? He didn't really state anything about porting, I made more of a statement about porting than he did..so I'm a bit confused there.
I wasn't trying to argue whether or not a direct and/ore unobstructed airflow path through the engine matters. Of course that matters. There are way too many variables though, as in how much the TB can flow, how much the intake, heads, exhaust, etc. can flow. Then there is the case of too big of an airflow. Like I said, I believe we completely misunderstood each other!![]()
2000 GMC Sierra 5.3L 4x4 ECSB