He said nothing about changing converters. He said nothing about raising the shift points. Going a heck of a lot bigger with a 5.5k shift point is only going to hurt bottom end torque more than increasing HP in the range he's talking.
Keeping duration in check while increasing lift typically does not hurt torque as much while increasing HP. I'll have to read back through the posts, there was another guy jumping on, but I thought I read a post about porting, hence my comments. Look at the bottom. If you THINK that going above 0.450" lift is not worth it, then why be in favor of a LS6 cam that 0.550/0.547?
5.3 LM7
190/191 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.466" / 0.457" int/exh lift
114 LSA
2002+ LS6 cam
204/218 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.551" / 0.547" int/exh lift
117 LSA
GMPP Hot Cam
218/227 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.525" / 0.525" int/exh lift
112 LSA
Why does everybody keep commenting about the pushrods? I never said anything about changing pushrods. I said that the stock springs won't handle the LS6 lift/ramp profile. I also said that the Yellow springs are marginal above 6000 rpm with the heavier, non Ti LS6 valves.
No the lobes are not incredibly aggressive, but it makes pretty decent power, with factory springs. It will run a LONG time without any spring, cam lobe wear issues. Yes, it's longer duration, but the LSA is pulled 5 degrees in from the LS6 cam. This should help conserve torque.
My opinion is based on talking with the guys that designed the LS6 cam and valvetrain. I have gone the gamut of looking at factory cam options, from LS6 to the Hot, to LS7 and LS3, so I asked a lot of the same questions the original poster asked, and relayed the answers I was given.