+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: LS1 cast iron or Alum.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8

    LS1 cast iron or Alum.

    I am looking to purchase the LS1 engine to swap in my 1994 Z71 and see both iron and alum blocks. Is there any major differences other than price ?
    What is the best setup ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    807
    Iron blocks came in the truck and SUV's and weigh about 70lbs more
    than alum. blocks.

    Iron is stronger and cheaper to find
    70lbs weight savings isnt gonna mean much to you in a 4,000lbs truck
    2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
    1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
    2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
    If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mesquite, TX
    Posts
    4,321
    Quote Originally Posted by r.barn View Post
    Iron blocks came in the truck and SUV's and weigh about 70lbs more
    than alum. blocks.

    Iron is stronger and cheaper to find
    70lbs weight savings isnt gonna mean much to you in a 4,000lbs truck

    Aluminum will take just as much as the cast and the weight is about 140lbs difference...that's why i went with an LS2 block
    2006 silverado SS....Clifford Jr...turbo coming soon
    1970 Chevelle ly6 swap....d1 coming soon

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    807
    Quote Originally Posted by mean05 View Post
    Aluminum will take just as much as the cast and the weight is about 140lbs difference...that's why i went with an LS2 block
    Anyone got a link to weight difference on iron vs. aluminum.

    I've seen everything from 65-140 lbs difference
    Anyone have a reliable source for what it is ..... for sure ?
    2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
    1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
    2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
    If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Spiro, Oklahoma
    Posts
    316
    Heres a link that was posted here earlier this week. the author says the difference is 65 pounds. Thats the answer I got the most when I started shopping around for my engine swap. The only thing I don't like about the aluminum block is that I've heard they can't be over bored much. The same link states that the aluminum block can only be bored .010 over, but I'm assuming thats for the 5.7LS1 block.


    Gen III GM Small Block: Engine Builder


    Quote:
    "These blocks already have a 4.0? bore, so they're the best alternative for the guy who wants a bigger motor for his car as long as he's willing to put up with the additional weight (65 lbs.) of the iron block. The only other way to build a big bore motor with a stock block is to buy one of the new 6.0L aluminum blocks, but that's bound to be real expensive."
    Last edited by low91; 04-24-2009 at 02:26 PM.
    1991 Silverado-L33 5.3L, 212/218 .557 .562 115+4, ASP under drive pulley,180* thermostat, 90mm truck intake w/ LS3 throttle body. Shoenfeld conversion headers and duel Flowmaster exhaust. Performabuilt LVL 1 transmission and 23-2500 stall converter.

  6. #6
    For all intents and purposes, it's damn near 100#, like 97-99#. I weighed my bare 5.3L, and my bare LS2 block, and a junk LS1 block, came pretty close to that.


    As for overbore, the LS2 and LS3 blocks OEM recommended overbore is 0.020", and you can get service pistons if needed. LS1 Blocks are recommended for a max of 0.010 overbore. The 4.8/5.3 Iron block allows the biggest over bore, I know you can at least go to to the 3.898" (aka 99mm) LS1 bore, not sure if you can 0.020 or 0.010 over that like on the aluminum blocks.

    Not sure if this worth mentioning, but there is a very small number of the 5.3L aluminum blocks that are actually LS6 block CASTINGS, with the smaller 96mm cylinder liner. These can be overbored to 5.7L. Again, these are very rare, but they are out there in the LM4 equipped 2004 Rainiers, 2003-2004 Trailblazer EXT, 2003-2004 Envoy XL/XUV's, and 2003-2004 SSR's.

    As for the other iron blocks, I have seen people going 0.060" over, not sure what is the max-safest overbore. OEM calls out 0.020, but what the aftermarket has been doing seems to be going a little further than that.

    Just reading over the engine builder article revealed lots of incorrect info, but in general it's more correct than it's wrong.
    Last edited by beertestr; 04-30-2009 at 10:39 AM.
    Mike
    http://kds-performance.com
    94 Silverado Z71 SCLB 4.8L LR4 Daily Driver
    93 GMC Sierra 2WD LS V8 Swap dun, run, rusted, stripped & junked
    1979 Caprice Coupe - LS Swapped - 11.76@115.8

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    807
    Quote Originally Posted by beertestr View Post
    For all intents and purposes, it's damn near 100#, like 97-99#. I weighed my bare 5.3L, and my bare LS2 block, and a junk LS1 block, came pretty close to that.
    lol

    now have

    65 lbs
    99 lbs
    170 lbs


    Personally 100 lbs "sounds" about right. Thought 65 sounded low, but
    thought 170 was high too.

    For as cheap as you can get iron truck blocks for I just dont see paying
    extra for the aluminum. Maybe in a drag car where you're counting 10th's
    but dont see the difference in a 5,000 lbs truck.
    2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
    1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
    2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
    If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    mississippi
    Posts
    930
    Quote Originally Posted by r.barn View Post
    lol

    now have

    65 lbs
    99 lbs
    170 lbs


    Personally 100 lbs "sounds" about right. Thought 65 sounded low, but
    thought 170 was high too.

    For as cheap as you can get iron truck blocks for I just dont see paying
    extra for the aluminum. Maybe in a drag car where you're counting 10th's
    but dont see the difference in a 5,000 lbs truck.
    what he sead if you had a race car it would be one thing but you have a 4x4 truck
    04 1500 5.3L custom hp tuners tune by myself don have a pic of it yet so hear is my old 01 chevy 5.3 460hp 13.669 @ 116

  9. #9
    Can I vote twice? 100 is the closest answer... there, I'm stuffing the ballot boxes.
    Maybe I should take some pics of me weighing them next time I have a bare iron block to weigh, the 2 I have right now still have cranks, cams and covers on them.
    Last edited by beertestr; 04-30-2009 at 11:01 AM.
    Mike
    http://kds-performance.com
    94 Silverado Z71 SCLB 4.8L LR4 Daily Driver
    93 GMC Sierra 2WD LS V8 Swap dun, run, rusted, stripped & junked
    1979 Caprice Coupe - LS Swapped - 11.76@115.8

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    i had read in the LS1 books it was 90#
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts