Supercharger.. what kind?
or turbo it??
Im thinking about doing FI on my truck but I dont know wich way to go..
Thanks
Printable View
Supercharger.. what kind?
or turbo it??
Im thinking about doing FI on my truck but I dont know wich way to go..
Thanks
a turbo would love 4WD...
Tur BO Yes turbos love 4wds. R U mostly off roading or street. Off road I'd go with a TVS 1900 or 2300. Street = front mount trik turbo.
since you just ordered long tube headers and off road pipe, I would go with a supercharger TVS 1900.
x2
THANKS!! Where can I find the TVS's?? and whats the difference between 1900 and 2300???
Size. Go with the big one. No such thing as too small.
http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/racer...tvs-tahoe.html
http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/dynod...n-results.html
and this video is the best
Video: Swartzlander's Eaton TVS Supercharged Truck at Eaton Drag Outing - .: UNDER PRESSURE :.
Yeah, a TVS system would work well. There have been good results from a 1900 on 5.3L motors. Not sure if the 2300 is too much blower for the 5.3L... Since the new TVS system has come out--the Radix systems have gone down in price. The Radix is still a good unit which makes good power (+~150rwhp), but you WILL need to invest in a meth kit to keep the IATs down...
Mic, your Tahoe ran 108 mph compared to this truck ,lol. that tahoe is in the 12's for sure with a good launch.
Iat's are more than under control with the tvs system. The iats actually get cooler the more you get on it.
No need for a meth kit right away under 8psi. Iat's won't get higher than 120deg or so up to 100+mph.
I say TVS!
later,
allen
Yes Allen, agreed that you will not need a Meth kit with a TVS. I was talking about if the did get a 112 unit, he would need the meth kit. I can't tell you how many people who have run a 112, 112HH, 122 Radix units that have unusually high IATs. But they have done a great job on the unit design of the new TVS systems to keep the internal temps down by making it super efficient. I say go TVS too--but if you have to fall back on a Radix system--its still a great unit...its a win-win situation for ya!
Allen, do you have the TVS system for sale?? If not, where can I find them??
if i was gonna do it again i would go tvs 2300 they are really efficient as far as intake air temps and pulleyed right can make a lot of boost.
Take my advice on this man and listen well if you are looking for a quick fix and cheap horsepower FI is not your solution. Be prepared to spend alot of money on supporting mods i.e. FULLY built tranny cam pushrods meth guages so you can watch what goin on A GOOD TUNER THAT KNOWS FI, rear end trutrac or a 14 bolt tranny coolers . thats not every thing i have spent over 16k on my fi kit and im still gettin bugs out. be prepared to be patient man i will be more than glad to help you with any ?s you have. If your gonna go FI there is no half ass you gotta do it right or you will blow you sh1t up
i agree 100% rider.be prepared to spend alot of money bud.
^^^^Tru dat...
I better get to work...! LOL!
Thanks anyways!! I just have the FI bug, cause I need to run faster..
Last I heard, the TVS2300 kits are not available yet. I heard that Magnuson has not been able to get rotor packages from Eaton because their entire production of them is going to Chevy for the ZR-1 engine. 2300 is too big for the 5.3 anyway...it would be right at home on a 400+ cubic inch engine. 1900 would be a better fit.
Too much for a 5.3 well what about a 4.6. To change someone elses qoute a little. "A supercharger is like a penis you always want a bigger one when you go to use it." Go for the big gun. If a frikkin 4.6 uses it why not a 5.3.
ROUSH Performance: TVS2300 ROUSHchargerŽ Kit (Complete Kit) Detail
That one in that link for the 4.6L is $5,899... how much would it be for a 5.3L?? Where can I find those?
Well if he wants to find the limits of the 5.3 a 2300 would do that quite well. I remember hearing that it's very comfortable feeding a 408ci engine 15 psi. That much airflow would pop a stock 5.3 in no time flat. I'm sure a larger pulley can be fitted to drop the boost down, but then would the blower still be efficient? I'm sure someone can and will put that 2300 on a 5.3, but I will say that I think the 1900 is a much better fit.