+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: I expected more from Toyota and fords finest lol

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433

    I expected more from Toyota and fords finest lol

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW5RpsTABk4&sns=em

    Raptor vs tundra, I almost fell asleep waiting for them to finish the 1/4 lol. These 2 truck make impreassive hp and tq, but 16 and 17 mph passes is what my 5.3 did stock at what less than 300 hp? Makes you wander what happin lol

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    Sorry 16 and 17 sec 1/4 mile passes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    These new trucks weigh 1000lbs or more than than they use to plus emmisions get tighter every year. Its a tough balance to play.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    Man I was looking at there power numbers and Thot they should least be close to a 13sec trap

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    Peak power is great, but need to keep in mind those are motor dyno numbers not to the wheels. They are severly limited from the factory to save parts under warranty. The 2014 CC 5.3 with a tune has already seen 14s. these trucks are also giant bricks. I agree the numbers suck, but there are a lot of explanations.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    You just hear all the tundra guys brag on how great there trucks are, and then there not any better than my 2000 silverado at almost a 100 hp under what they claim. I understand there detuned and limited so they can't hurt there self, but if it's that much that don't say a lot about the parts then lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    There is a difference between their and there. I suggest you learn it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    blanco,tx
    Posts
    358
    There's a difference? I thot they were the same!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Long Beach California
    Posts
    637
    hey hey now. it may not be involved in the post but if your giving lessons dont forget the third... "they're"
    Like Tumbler in "Gone in 60" I'll drive anything with wheels or without

    My 95 ECSB LQ9 build thread - http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/lsx-t...to-95-obs.html
    CALI LEGAL ENGINE SWAP!
    Stock 03 LQ9, DBW, 95' 4l80e w/ Transgo shift kit, 2010 50# GM injectors, 2800 Circle D stall, Spectre CAI, Upgraded trans cooler, Home-made E-fans/shroud, Dual EP-381 fuel pumps w/Home-made hotwire kit
    NEXT ON LIST: Dual Battery setup, CAM/Valvetrain upgrade, Build my own rear mount turbo, TRU-TRAC, HIT THE STRIP!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,705
    Lot of power if lost due to Altitude.......

    Still both sucks. My Hybrid will be faster in that altitude

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts