Finally installed my maggy between deployments and not exactly impressed with the results. Was kinda hot and humid out, but I don't think the hp curve looks right. didn't have time to get a before so nothing to really compare it to. Inputs on this being a valid dyno run or not?
Last edited by HuskerBlood; 07-27-2010 at 09:37 PM.
'01 RCSB 5.3L BLK Silverado, Radix 112, ABEL Racing Tune, LT Pacesetters ORY, 3"Magnaflow
I'm gonna beat everybody to it and say it's the tune. Seems odd to have the tq that much higher than the hp
yeah, thats what I thought. Think I will just drive south and get a NP tune after a few more mods go on. 2 more years of truck parts littering my apt.
'01 RCSB 5.3L BLK Silverado, Radix 112, ABEL Racing Tune, LT Pacesetters ORY, 3"Magnaflow
that reading is off by 1k rpms
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
they are supposed to cross at 5200 correct?
blown transmissions are about as useful as 97% of the guys on this forum
IndeedOriginally Posted by oleshifty
JOHN
well every other chart I have seen on the web does, but I have never dynoed anything before. Any Idea why its off by 1k rpms, and is any of the data useful? I'm sure he would retune it if I showed him a reason.
'01 RCSB 5.3L BLK Silverado, Radix 112, ABEL Racing Tune, LT Pacesetters ORY, 3"Magnaflow
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
