+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Wierd Engine ?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    1,304

    Wierd Engine ?

    Ok, so on another forum there was a guy who said that in 99-00 "in rare cases" some blocks were stamped 4.8/5.3/6.0, meaning that the same block could be use for all 3 applications. Is this true or is this guy blowing smoke? If it is in fact true could I just have my 1999 4.8 bored to 6.0 spec and then just get a 6.0 crank for it? Not sure if this would be more cost effective than buying a 6.0 or not. My thinkin is that if all I need to buy is a rotating assembly,cam and some 243's I can put more towards a built 4l80.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    blowing smoke,

    a 4.8/5.3 can become a 364 but its to much work since it uses a specific crank

    typically the 4.8 becomes 346
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicago-ish
    Posts
    174
    I think that 99turbogmc is asking if his 4.8 might have cylinder walls so thick that they could be bored all the way to 6.0 size.
    2000 Sierra 2500 HD. 408 (11-2007) Whipplecharged, Big (18x24x4) FMIC.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    1,304
    I think it'd just be easier to keep my engine in my truck while I build up a 6oh. So, is 408 the max a 6.0 can be bored to. That's a bore of .060 right? with stock crank or a 4.1" crank?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by 99turbogmc View Post
    I think it'd just be easier to keep my engine in my truck while I build up a 6oh. So, is 408 the max a 6.0 can be bored to. That's a bore of .060 right? with stock crank or a 4.1" crank?
    408 is a 4.030 bore with 4" crank
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    1,304
    Ahhh, I see. I've always wondered how to figure displacement using stroke and bore. Care to enlighten me quick?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeGyver View Post
    I think that 99turbogmc is asking if his 4.8 might have cylinder walls so thick that they could be bored all the way to 6.0 size.
    i answer that. most a 4.8/5.3 block can be bored is 346. it can be a 383 with 4" crank

    a 4.8 can become a 364 but its a stroke thing
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Chicago-ish
    Posts
    174
    radius squared times pi times stroke times 8
    or 4.03 Divided by 2 = 2.015 (radius)
    2.015 x 2.015= 4.060225
    4.060225 x 3.14159 (pi) =12.75556225775
    12.75556225775 x 4 (stroke)= 51.022249031
    51.022249031 x 8 = 408.177992248
    2000 Sierra 2500 HD. 408 (11-2007) Whipplecharged, Big (18x24x4) FMIC.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bellevue, Nebraska
    Posts
    1,304
    Ahhhh, so the volume displaced by the piston during movement multiplied by stroke then multiply for each cylinder.
    I just used this site:
    Interactive Engine Displacement Calculator
    I figure if I bored a 6L to 4.060 then got a 4.125 crank I'd have me a 427. This is sounding very tempting. Can a 6L block hold a 4.125 crank?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by 99turbogmc View Post
    Ahhhh, so the volume displaced by the piston during movement multiplied by stroke then multiply for each cylinder.
    I just used this site:
    Interactive Engine Displacement Calculator
    I figure if I bored a 6L to 4.060 then got a 4.125 crank I'd have me a 427. This is sounding very tempting. Can a 6L block hold a 4.125 crank?
    dont do that, stick with a 408. that goofy crank would cause havioc. also the block isnt strong enough at that thickness. some do it that thin but eh id stay away. plus its custom pistons which is godly amount

    you want a 427 do it the good way. 4.125 bore of a X block with a 4" crank. which you can find pistons OTS
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts