+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: which has more HP

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hugo, Ok
    Posts
    101

    which has more HP

    a vortec 350 or a 5.3?

    i can find 350 real easy and cheap..but all the 5.3 seem like they got more power to me

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    spring, texas
    Posts
    171
    You answered your own question.......Any LS motor has more potential per $ spent over the conventional SBC.
    2009 YUKON DENALI,BLACK ON BLACK, LS3, Dynomax 4" cat-back, VARA-RAM INTAKE, KOOKS LT's, MSD IGNITION, LS VVT hot cam, ZO6 springs, HP tuned to 421awhp, 12.54 at 108mph on 24's.TUNING FROM THE DARKSIDE.

    06 KAWI BRUTE FORCE 916cc 6.80's in the 1/8th. ALL MOTOR. New found drug addiction is getting "HER" into the 5's. "EVER HAD A QUAD TAKE YOUR MONEY?"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    5.3 In With The New,out With The Old

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hugo, Ok
    Posts
    101
    thats what i was thinkin.

    saw something that said the vortec had like 235 hp and a ls 5.3 has like 285

    just wonderin how close that was to real #

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    even the LT1 doesnt compare to the 5.3
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    even the LT1 doesnt compare to the 5.3
    VERY TRUE,I WOULD SPANK MY BUDDYS 95Z28 ALL DAY IN MY EXT CAB 5.3 HAHA

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    807
    Vortec 350 was nothing but a 1950's 350 chevy small block.
    They can be built DIRT cheap. Also not the greatest of engines.

    There are MANY difference beyond hp that make the 5.3 Gen III engine
    MUCH better than the old school SBC's
    2002 Tahoe 4.8 - soon to be turbo'd - SOLD
    1989 Mustang - LX Vert - 351W-TT - 2inches of dust covering it
    2012 Raptor - 497rwhp at 10psi
    If you aint breaking - you aint going fast enough

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hugo, Ok
    Posts
    101
    i like my old carb sbc..but i wanna go furl injected..guess ill either get a 4.8, 5.3, 6.0

  9. #9
    But in the SBC defense, you can build one of those motor for way less and still have a lot of hp. You can build a chevy 350 with 2000k and it will be a very bad ass motor, you cant build a ls motor with 2000 bucks.

    Im talking about 383 stroker by the way.
    Last edited by 6.0vortecchevy; 01-19-2009 at 07:07 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    naples fl
    Posts
    294
    a traditional sbc will make more hp per dollar. both are pretty good bang for the buck though. and stock to stock yea, 5.3 should be more powerfull, but the 350 wouldn't be too far off on torque.
    01 GMC sclb d-max 2wd.
    2.2 60' 8.9 1/8th


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts