+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: S&P Headers

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    621
    Sweet! Good job Nitrous. Just wish you would have done this about 6 months ago. Maybe while they're listening to you, you can get them to change their gayass collectors. Hell while your at it get em to just go ahead & make some longtubes.

    [1/8 mile E.T. - 8.23 @ 82.86 mph w/1.82 60'] '98swb,4/6drop,20"RozziDeeps on 275/40ToyoProxes '98LS1/4L60E,TRCheaTR cam,Ported TB,Billet MAF ends,MSD8.5 superconductor wires,S&P midlengths,!EGR,!cats,2 1/2" true duals w/X-pipe,Dynomax Ultraflows,TCI 3000,billet servo,TCI deep aluminum pan,3.73's w/Auburn posi; Eclipse CD, Rockford 6 1/2's, Memphis 12's, Punch 200 ix, Punch 500x

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    Ya, the collectors will be a pain in the butt to change gaskets due to the bolt to header clearance I made sure I put all of the nuts facing towards the ground to make things easier.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Just form yourself a large tube and weld it to the flange instead of using the collector. Then you can make them like a long tube. I wonder if that would really work since the exhaust gases would already be combined. A large tube where the stock flange is, down from there with a 4" tube like it were a standard long tube exhaust header and then to a standard reducer flange.... I wonder what that would do to the feel of the exhaust.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    That would be pretty easy. I think it would act as a long tube header.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    anything from a 3.25" or larger pipe would provide more flow area than four 1-5/8" diameter exhaust tubes.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    I agree. I think they built the flanges for flow characteristics. All of the tubes go into a 5" area that swedges down to a 2 1/2" pipe. Too bad it has the 02 bung in it already, if it didn't I would get mark to bump it up to a minimum of 3" I'm running 2 1/2" exhaust now but I'd replace it with 3" if that were the case. Right now anything larger than the 2 1/2" flange pipe wouldn't help me out since the 2 1/2" exhaust would restrict it. I guess we could always install cutouts.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    621
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NITROUS &#064; Apr 15 2006, 09&#58;52 PM) [snapback]50177[/snapback]</div>
    I agree. I think they built the flanges for flow characteristics. All of the tubes go into a 5" area that swedges down to a 2 1/2" pipe. Too bad it has the 02 bung in it already, if it didn&#39;t I would get mark to bump it up to a minimum of 3" I&#39;m running 2 1/2" exhaust now but I&#39;d replace it with 3" if that were the case. Right now anything larger than the 2 1/2" flange pipe wouldn&#39;t help me out since the 2 1/2" exhaust would restrict it. I guess we could always install cutouts.
    [/b]
    How do you figure they built them for flow characteristics? The collecters reduce down to 2 1/2" so abruptly I can&#39;t see how they could possibly flow well. Sorry but I hate these headers. The only reason I&#39;m runnin em is they&#39;re the only header available & I hate manifolds even more. BTW they sell collecters without bungs (or buns as S&P calls them). I thought about cutting the collecter off just before it necked down and having the exhaust shop weld on some 4" pipe or so & then reduce it down to my current exhaust. Might as well have them weld the collecters to the header while they&#39;re at it, so I wouldn&#39;t have to worry about any more leaks. My driver side coll. is leaking now and driving me crazy. I can&#39;t get the bolts tight enough with the header installed to keep it from blowing out the gasket. They&#39;re welded to the exhaust so I will have to cut them off and have them rewelded. Did I mention that I hate these headers?

    [1/8 mile E.T. - 8.23 @ 82.86 mph w/1.82 60&#39;] &#39;98swb,4/6drop,20"RozziDeeps on 275/40ToyoProxes &#39;98LS1/4L60E,TRCheaTR cam,Ported TB,Billet MAF ends,MSD8.5 superconductor wires,S&P midlengths,&#33;EGR,&#33;cats,2 1/2" true duals w/X-pipe,Dynomax Ultraflows,TCI 3000,billet servo,TCI deep aluminum pan,3.73&#39;s w/Auburn posi; Eclipse CD, Rockford 6 1/2&#39;s, Memphis 12&#39;s, Punch 200 ix, Punch 500x

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    LMAO&#33;&#33;&#33; I think they have better flow than the shorties. JMHO Let me explain myself, I should have done that in my previous post. If you took this design, bumped the collector up to 3" to 3 1/2" and had the collector welded into it and not bolted I think the flow design would work. I&#39;m supposed to be getting the dyno papers from these headers which are supposed to increase HP by 20. I agree, they could have made a long tube and eliminated the mid length but Danny said they didn&#39;t have a jig jet since they use pre bent tubing. The reason they left the header like this is because your average joe isn&#39;t gonna put 3" or larger exhaust on his truck. He&#39;s gonna stick with the stock 1 5/8". What size exhaust are you running? 3" or larger and dumping it in front of the rear axle? If not, a different header isn&#39;t gonna help out that much.

    Hey motoxlifer, did you go by the header break in procedure? I&#39;m sure you did but I thought I&#39;d ask.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    621
    Ummm what header break in procedure? I guess I missed that part. What is it? I&#39;m runnin 2 1/2" exhaust dumped in front of the axle. What do you mean the average joe is going to stick with the stock 1 5/8"? Is stock exhaust tubing 1 5/8"? I thought our primary tubes were 1 5/8". I did some reading on exhaust sizes and from what it said with my motor & mods it would be a waste of time & money to run 3" pipe. I like the looks of these headers & I&#39;m sure they make some extra power. I&#39;m just pissed off at em because of the problems I&#39;ve had with them.

    [1/8 mile E.T. - 8.23 @ 82.86 mph w/1.82 60&#39;] &#39;98swb,4/6drop,20"RozziDeeps on 275/40ToyoProxes &#39;98LS1/4L60E,TRCheaTR cam,Ported TB,Billet MAF ends,MSD8.5 superconductor wires,S&P midlengths,&#33;EGR,&#33;cats,2 1/2" true duals w/X-pipe,Dynomax Ultraflows,TCI 3000,billet servo,TCI deep aluminum pan,3.73&#39;s w/Auburn posi; Eclipse CD, Rockford 6 1/2&#39;s, Memphis 12&#39;s, Punch 200 ix, Punch 500x

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    I was pretty tired last night I believe the stock exhaust tubing is 1 7/8. Nevertheless, it&#39;s way too small. Ya, they have a break in procedure where you make a short exhaust run and then tighten everything back up before you drive it. I&#39;ll have to post what it says. It was really simple. It also tells what to wash the coating with. I hear what your saying about the headers though, they&#39;ll just have to get us by until we can find something else.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts