+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: Ls6, fast, edelbrock ect...

  1. #11
    ff_jeff Guest
    I'm looking for something that will make power up past 6krpms... and that will still make power in a 6.0 with the same setup. I figured SOMEONE has to have tested them before and after????

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    I think Greg and others are saying what I did in a better manner...and I did not mention the LS2 as it's obviously different than any F-car intake. But remember, we were talking about the LS6 (for a while)....my point was that ALL 5.7 car engines had the LS6 intake at some point (2001-2002?).

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bakersville, NC
    Posts
    608
    Quote Originally Posted by GasGuzzler View Post
    I think Greg and others are saying what I did in a better manner...and I did not mention the LS2 as it's obviously different than any F-car intake. But remember, we were talking about the LS6 (for a while)....my point was that ALL 5.7 car engines had the LS6 intake at some point (2001-2002?).
    correct starting in 2001.
    David,
    2003 GMC Sierra Denali, LQ4, AWD, AWS, 4.10, Wheatley 93 tune, LT headers, GMPP CAI, BBK 80mm TB, MSD wires, E3 plugs, 160* T-stat, Flowmonster DI/DO, cutouts. Working on 4.8 heads, just purchased Comp 228R cam, 918 Springs, TI retainers, 7.4 hardend pushrods,

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    97 to 00 had the ls1 intake

    01 and 02 had the LS6 intake

    Ls6 outflows the Ls2

    Ls2 is similar to the ls1 intake even tho it has a 90mm opening and on paper it looks to be better then the Ls6 it actually isnt

    IMHO there are only 2 intakes out there worth any money or time installing....these are the Ls6 and the Fast90 [ported 90 is tits]

    I run the Ls2 cause im boosted and wanted the bling factor of reusing my 90mm tb and allowng myself to use 4" tubing. If i was building a turbo Fbody i would just use the LS6 intake


    Now for what you want Jeff, if you cant afford the Fast 90 then Port your 78mm tb then run the Ls6 intake

    to run the car intake you just need to take the idler pulley from on the Alt bracket and side it over about 3" to the other bolt that is there now. this will allow you to run the car intake with still using the truck accesories.
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  5. #15
    ff_jeff Guest
    What about the vic Jr. ?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by ff_jeff View Post
    What about the vic Jr. ?
    i dont like them for most applications. ppl run them for cool factor and arent using them properly. most lose power using this style intake since the cam they have isnt meant for that style of air flow. something solid roller and big rpms i would consider this style intake along with a 4500 fast TB besides that the fast 90 is best intake IMHO for majority of ppl
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Malvern, AR
    Posts
    93
    There is a article on the fast 92 in the feb 09 super chevy on a 5.3 out of a 02 tahoe and they gained 34 horsepower on dyno. Overall with a cam, heads, headers, fast 92 and tuning the 5.3 put down 475 horses and 441 torque.
    99 GMC 5.3 RCSS, K&N, E-Fans, Headman Shorties, Built 4L60E, 220/220 .581/.581 112, 80mmm TB, Nelson Tuned

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    9,578
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    I think the fbody/ybody LS1 engines had one style from 97 to mid year 2001 and then they switched all the LS1/LS6 engines to the flat floor LS6 intake. LS2 intake is totally different, many report losing HP running the LS2 intake on a 5.7L and smaller engine since it was designed for use on a 6L engine.
    Yes, yes. Good call Gregory.

    Quote Originally Posted by ff_jeff View Post
    I'm looking for something that will make power up past 6krpms... and that will still make power in a 6.0 with the same setup. I figured SOMEONE has to have tested them before and after????
    Well, then that would be the LS6.

    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    Ls6 outflows the Ls2

    Ls2 is similar to the ls1 intake even tho it has a 90mm opening and on paper it looks to be better then the Ls6 it actually isnt
    Repetition of statement. George is absolutely correct.
    The LS2 intake would work better with a truck (preferably of 6.0L in displacement) due to the intake runner design to make more torque versus the LS6. But if you want absolute power in the upper RPM range, go with LS6/FAST 90.

    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    IMHO there are only 2 intakes out there worth any money or time installing....these are the Ls6 and the Fast90 [ported 90 is tits]

    Now for what you want Jeff, if you cant afford the Fast 90 then Port your 78mm tb then run the Ls6 intake

    to run the car intake you just need to take the idler pulley from on the Alt bracket and side it over about 3" to the other bolt that is there now. this will allow you to run the car intake with still using the truck accesories.

    2000 ECSB 6.0L
    TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    9,578
    Also, if you plan on spending the time of money into doing this type of intake work, might as well go ahead and get some head work done. Is all of this going on the 4.8L?

    2000 ECSB 6.0L
    TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by txarkitekt View Post
    Also, if you plan on spending the time of money into doing this type of intake work, might as well go ahead and get some head work done. Is all of this going on the 4.8L?
    nothing wrong witha 4.8 lol
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts