+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Understanding the Racetrack

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    Hey guys, I just wanted to discuss the racetrack. Feel free to chime in. I hear a lot of guys not really understanding how time, hp, launching, etc plays a part at the track.
    When a car runs a 9sec 1/4 mile, we all know it's haulin ass, or a truck runs a 12sec, it's moving very well.
    But there's more to it.

    I'm not trying to be the know it all about racing, but I wanted to explain how HP, MPH, and ET relate when running down the track.

    Imagine three points down the 1/4 mile. A: starting line, B: mid way (1/8mile), and C: finish line.

    Start at point A and walk to B, then run as fast as you can to C. Let's say it took you 5mins to finish the 1/4 mile.
    Now, start at point A and run to B, then continue running to C. Say it took 2.5mins to finish.
    Understand how running from point A to B dropped your time, you're not running any faster through the 1/4 mile, but you got there quicker.
    Also, see how you ran your ass off through the 1/4 mile, but you didn't run any faster than you did at the 1/8 when compared to the finish line?
    This is a good comparison on how a higher stall converter works. It allows your truck to launch off the line hard and get to the finish line quicker, not necessarily at a faster mph.

    For example, my Avalanche ran the 1/4 mile at 14.7 at 97mph with the stock stall converter, after the 2600 stall was installed, it now runs 13.9 @ 98mph. See how it got off the line quicker and got to the finish line quicker.

    As far as HP, this is what moves you faster through the traps. MPH is a good indication of how fast a truck is and how much HP it has.

    Reaction time, this doesn't mean anything during test and tune. Going back to the example above. When the light turns green, stand at point A for 1 min, then start, it took you longer to get started, but you still made it through the 1/4 mile in 2.5mins when using the second example.
    I just had to say that because I hear guys at the fence sayin, "man did you see that, 2 sec reaction time and he ran a 15, that truck is good for a 13sec pass" that's not true. Even if it had a perfect reaction time, it would still run the 1/4 mile in 15secs.

    So to sum it up, if you want to lower your ET, get off the line a lot harder!!

    I didn't mean to try to sound rude or all knowing, lol, I just know a lot guys don't go to the track and I'm sure they all have questions but don't want to ask. I get these questions all the time, hope it helps clear up some questions.

    Anyone have anything to add or debate?

    thanks,
    allen

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    Good analogies - I guess one of my questions would be how would you go about actually matching a stall to a cam? Are there any proven methods or "formulas"?

    Obviously the cam mainly gives the hp and the stall gets you there quicker, so with all of the different stalls, I would assume you would want the one that gets you there the quickest for your best 1/4 mile times.




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    1,712
    that was a great way to clear things up allen, sometimes laymans terms help out a lot. I ts great to learn all you can so your confident when going to the track, Drag racing is a lot more than just mashing the pedal and going.You can have the same horsepower but can use different parts or techniques to get better starts or traction to yield different times.
    07 SILVERADO CLASSIC 2500 HD 4x4 CREW CAB LT3 DURAMAX LBZ/ALLISON 6 SPEED 5'' MBRP Turbo back exhaust 6'' TIP /NO CAT- NO MUFF/ AFE Intake/ EDGE HOT JUICE /MERCHANT AUTO STG III Built Allison/P I ConverterTTS Twin Lift Pumps. Tierod sleeves/Cognito braces.17x9 Moto metals_______ Old Truck ,04 Z-71/Turbocharged,/cam/stall/Zippy Built TRANS/Nelson Tuned------

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    george west texas
    Posts
    3,694
    yep...i dropped a 1/2 second off my time with a restalled stock verter...
    allen there is more in yours if you can hot lap it...you will see a gain of 2 tenths or better for a couple since the turbo gets hotter every run and spools up better giving you a better et....that goes to anybody with a sts turbo system....
    '13 silverado LT...stock

    '11 lt 4x4 z71..tvs1900

    '01 gmc twins 6.0 jakes 400 ladder bars w/ coilovers tuned by nelson performance

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    springfield MO
    Posts
    226
    that is a neat way to look at the analogy,
    I am planning on going to the test and tune tonight...I have not raced in years so I am not sure what to expect. I have not ran my 68 down the track especially with the new motor. My problem on the street anyway is traction. I havent figured out a launching technique that really impresses me. Now my tires are old since I have had them on this truck for a long time during my build up and I dont have posi. The gearing is 3.73:1 so I am ok there. Once I save some more money I will get the limited slip.
    I am a stock (nelson tuned) 5.3 with a TB converter my truck weighs an estimated 3900 pounds.
    should be fun
    Dave
    1968 Chevy SWB Fleet. 2002 5.3 all stock (for now ) Nelson Tune 4l60e w/TB converter.
    ok not stock anymore...13.3 at 101
    Now with front mount turbo... new times soon

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    just had to say that because I hear guys at the fence sayin, "man did you see that, 2 sec reaction time and he ran a 15, that truck is good for a 13sec pass" that's not true. Even if it had a perfect reaction time, it would still run the 1/4 mile in 15secs.[/b]
    ive seen frame of thought in the forums way too many times. its heartbreaking to tell someone thir truck wouldnt have made a 14 or 13 second pass if their reaction time was better.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Most people don't realize that your ET isn't what's on the board but an addition of what's on the board plus your reaction time.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(RedHeartbeat &#064; May 19 2006, 08&#58;46 AM) [snapback]53559[/snapback]</div>
    Most people don&#39;t realize that your ET isn&#39;t what&#39;s on the board but an addition of what&#39;s on the board plus your reaction time.
    [/b]
    I&#39;m a bit confused, just to clear things up for me and others (unless I&#39;m the only one, lol). But your time on the board is what you ran, not a combination of your 1/4 mile time and your reaction time.
    Down here, the reaction time isn&#39;t added to the board time, it&#39;s just what your truck ran in the 1/4 mile.
    If your truck runs a 13.0sec in the 1/4 and your reaction time is 2secs, the board will still show 13.0secs.
    Now the total time if took to get through the 1/4 mile once the light turned green would be 15secs, but the actual 1/4 mile time is still 13.0sec.

    Just making sure I&#39;m reading your post right,
    thanks,
    allen

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    If you run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .502 and I run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .500, I win.
    If you run a 12.999 with a reaction time of .502 and I run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .500, I still win.

    In actual races, not test and tune nights, your ET is added to your reaction time and that is your final calculated time for the run. Test and tune nights, the first one across the line wins.

    NHRA is changing the reaction time standards to a flat 0.000 if you have a perfect light. Used to be it was a .400 or .500, can&#39;t remember which. The 0.000 will make it easier to calculate times and reactions and always made more sense IMO.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(RedHeartbeat &#064; May 19 2006, 11&#58;50 AM) [snapback]53572[/snapback]</div>
    If you run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .502 and I run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .500, I win.
    If you run a 12.999 with a reaction time of .502 and I run a 13.000 with a reaction time of .500, I still win.

    In actual races, not test and tune nights, your ET is added to your reaction time and that is your final calculated time for the run. Test and tune nights, the first one across the line wins.

    NHRA is changing the reaction time standards to a flat 0.000 if you have a perfect light. Used to be it was a .400 or .500, can&#39;t remember which. The 0.000 will make it easier to calculate times and reactions and always made more sense IMO.
    [/b]
    Yeah, a perfect light used to be a five-oh (.500). At least that&#39;s what it was in NY. I always wondered why they did that. The flat 0.000 makes a lot more sense. And that&#39;s what I was thinking too, your reaction time counts toward your overall run.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts