+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: I expected more from Toyota and fords finest lol

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,705
    Lot of power if lost due to Altitude.......

    Still both sucks. My Hybrid will be faster in that altitude

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    here is a full weight tundra with street tires and a factory supercharger. still under warranty
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbA9uWoHgAo

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    and an extended cab. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb9MNYFwUFA

    i got to ride in a crew max tundra with a TRD charger and a cat back...torquey, but like someone else mentioned those trucks are heavy as hell.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    That's pretty impreassive, I have a couple friends that have crew cab tundras and they always brag bout how fast they are, when I saw the high 16 trap speed I just expected the tundra to be faster. I mean that's what my extended cab ran when I got it, and it's what? 320 at the crank, tundra is close to 390. My silverado is pretty heavy to but if it had that power I'd expect 14s

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    I think the single cab tundra weighs as much as an extended cab Silverado...they are fat bitches.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    Damn!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    San Antonio TX
    Posts
    1,150
    The rams and fords are pretty heavy compared to the gm trucks 2.


    4.8, TSP 220, 6L90 swap, 3400 Stall, 4.10s w/30" drag radial and T76 @ 16lbs.
    Best ET 11.54@114 w 1.52 60ft
    Raceweight 4905 lbs.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gibbstown, NJ
    Posts
    685
    Quote Originally Posted by RS/SS 4.8 View Post
    The rams and fords are pretty heavy compared to the gm trucks 2.
    They should ALL just face the fact that GM builds a better truck


    That's just my .02

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    i've been in a few tundras. stock for stock, and if i didnt plan to be modifying i'd probably go with a crewmax tundra over the big3. i dont leave things stock though so i have a chevy.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Duluth Minnesnowta
    Posts
    147
    Anybody who admits that they would buy a tundra should get drug behind there Chevy.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts