Isn't the 10 CC a lot heavier and less aerodynamic than the 04 EC?
Isn't the 10 CC a lot heavier and less aerodynamic than the 04 EC?
99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
10 Sierra CC 6.2
03 Suburban 5.3
There's aerodynamics in trucks?Originally Posted by stngh8r
lol, I know what you mean. The 10 sierra does appear to have a much bigger and more blunt front end to push though.
99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
10 Sierra CC 6.2
03 Suburban 5.3
Yes but the horsepower and torque difference is dramatic between the 2 in stock form.
ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06
waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam
6.2l, when racing trucks aerodynamics doesnt matter especially in the 1/4, i mean really youll be going 100mph at the big end....maybe
THEY CALL ME G.
AZRAEL
2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
2023 300S 5.7
2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]
The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.
6two
Slowest in Oklahoma...
Results? I'm also thinking 6.2 is going to take it. I'm barely faster than some of them with just a tune and CAI and I'm running 8.70 in the 1/8.
2005 Silverado SS AWD
AEM CAI, ARH LTs, HD-2 shift kit with vette servo, Circle D 278mm 3200 stall Madtunesracing.com street tune (MTR now has a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno)
13.82 @ 94.92 w/1.83 60'
showdown was postponed. Probably happen in the next week or two.
99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
10 Sierra CC 6.2
03 Suburban 5.3
He is just scurred.
T-RAV99 GMC | 5.3 | Skinny White Guy Tuned
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
