+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Cam question...again!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Honeywood, Ontario
    Posts
    6,994
    They like a little shake, ever wonder why they like bikes? An old Triumph twin will do a better job than any guy.
    2006 Silverado
    Little Black Bitch

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    406
    Duration is what gives you a choppy idle. Duration is how long the valve is opened. You will notice choppy idles starting around 212 intake duration @ 0.50". More lift means more air and fuel into the cc. The LS6 cam is borderline from smooth to choppy. Its 207/217 .525 lift for the 01's but the 02's have slightly smaller intake duration but more lift. Something like this would be what you are lookin for. I mean hey they put these cams in 405hp motors. These cams in a 5.3 gives 50 hp increase on engine dyno.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fort Smith, Arkansas
    Posts
    496
    There is more than one factor contributing to the idle characteristics. Duration IS how long the valve is open but is not the main factor in deciding idle character. What makes in lope is valve overlap which is heavily influenced by loba seperation (LSA).
    '91 2WD RCSB
    5.3l L59 DBW
    4L80E
    TR220 cam
    RevMax 2800rpm stall converter
    Schoenfeld LT Headers
    Nelson tuned

    My Truck Video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rw9y1...&feature=email

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    406
    Quote Originally Posted by flattopwill View Post
    There is more than one factor contributing to the idle characteristics. Duration IS how long the valve is open but is not the main factor in deciding idle character. What makes in lope is valve overlap which is heavily influenced by loba seperation (LSA).
    Yes that is true. Widening the LSA reduces overlap and narrowing it makes it worse.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    that cam is way to small IMO, bigger is better, but you dont wanna go over 600 lift, my cam shakes my truck and it is clearly visible but i drive it everyday and it is completely streetable, i dont think you'd be very happy with that little cam.
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,033
    Quote Originally Posted by LamboDoNoMo View Post
    that cam is way to small IMO, bigger is better, but you dont wanna go over 600 lift, my cam shakes my truck and it is clearly visible but i drive it everyday and it is completely streetable, i dont think you'd be very happy with that little cam.

    dang i am actually agreeing with ya lol!!
    Simple: 408 on steroids!
    single digits coming soon!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    Quote Originally Posted by skeet View Post
    dang i am actually agreeing with ya lol!!
    stranger things have happened
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    62
    Okay so I called Thunder Racing for a little information on their cams, but also to inquire about the TR220 and its relation to me installing it into my 5.3. Any ways the guy practically was jumping out of his seat about the Cheater v.3 telling me he believes I would be much happier with the results of this cam, and how it dyno'd great numbers on a 5.3 1500! Since I couldn't find too awful much about it I thought I would ask the board and see what everyone here thinks about the specs of the Cheater v.3:

    Thunder Racing Custom Camshaft
    " CheaTR v.3" - 219/230 .607/.604 117 LSA. Off Idle-6800 RPM Power Band.

    I am absolutely no cam wizard and I have seen threads at least all day on the TR220 or TR224 not to mention Youtube Vids galore! Should I go with his advice or stick with a sure thing?!
    Don't forget its a stock 5.3l into an OBS swap, mods will include: Schoenfeld headers, 3in exhaust, Intake manifold (havent decided which one yet), Converter, and gearing will come once I get the rest outta the way! N/A for now unless NOS starts calling my name in the middle of the night! lol (hell just looking to make it fun)!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Texas
    Posts
    406
    Quote Originally Posted by Hivelocit View Post
    Okay so I called Thunder Racing for a little information on their cams, but also to inquire about the TR220 and its relation to me installing it into my 5.3. Any ways the guy practically was jumping out of his seat about the Cheater v.3 telling me he believes I would be much happier with the results of this cam, and how it dyno'd great numbers on a 5.3 1500! Since I couldn't find too awful much about it I thought I would ask the board and see what everyone here thinks about the specs of the Cheater v.3:

    Thunder Racing Custom Camshaft
    " CheaTR v.3" - 219/230 .607/.604 117 LSA. Off Idle-6800 RPM Power Band.

    I am absolutely no cam wizard and I have seen threads at least all day on the TR220 or TR224 not to mention Youtube Vids galore! Should I go with his advice or stick with a sure thing?!
    Don't forget its a stock 5.3l into an OBS swap, mods will include: Schoenfeld headers, 3in exhaust, Intake manifold (havent decided which one yet), Converter, and gearing will come once I get the rest outta the way! N/A for now unless NOS starts calling my name in the middle of the night! lol (hell just looking to make it fun)!
    I think thats kinda similar to the Torquer V3. Plenty of duration but you dont lose alot of low end cuz of the overlap. Plent of lift also for more fuel and air. Id say go for it. Its very streetable and will give you lots more torque.
    RUN WAT U BRUNG!!!!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    Quote Originally Posted by Hivelocit View Post
    Okay so I called Thunder Racing for a little information on their cams, but also to inquire about the TR220 and its relation to me installing it into my 5.3. Any ways the guy practically was jumping out of his seat about the Cheater v.3 telling me he believes I would be much happier with the results of this cam, and how it dyno'd great numbers on a 5.3 1500! Since I couldn't find too awful much about it I thought I would ask the board and see what everyone here thinks about the specs of the Cheater v.3:

    Thunder Racing Custom Camshaft
    " CheaTR v.3" - 219/230 .607/.604 117 LSA. Off Idle-6800 RPM Power Band.

    I am absolutely no cam wizard and I have seen threads at least all day on the TR220 or TR224 not to mention Youtube Vids galore! Should I go with his advice or stick with a sure thing?!
    Don't forget its a stock 5.3l into an OBS swap, mods will include: Schoenfeld headers, 3in exhaust, Intake manifold (havent decided which one yet), Converter, and gearing will come once I get the rest outta the way! N/A for now unless NOS starts calling my name in the middle of the night! lol (hell just looking to make it fun)!
    .....im not 100% sure but i think .600 lift is to high for a stock 5.3
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts