+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 63

Thread: Is the 6.0 the best?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    12,078
    Yeah but then again everyone likes different stuff for different reasons and there is not always a tried and true black and white fully definitive reason one option is better than another.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    I like my 5.7!
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    2,348
    well i liked my 6.0 and then i thought i liked my 408 and it broke my trans and then it broke and idk yet about the 4.8 but i like to look at it
    74 Austin Morris Mini 1000 - Daily Coil Spring conversion, lowered, Disc Brake conversion
    FOR SALE: 04 RC/LB Duramax -12 second tow pig, built Allison, Tune, and supporting mods
    FOR SALE: 03 Silverado SS -DBRods built 40X, DP, Suspension. Going for fast

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    To the OP... all the LS motors are good motors if built right(you know who you are). They have their oiling issues and certain blocks don't like certain strokes... other than that they are great!! And you can find them for cheap if you shop around. Any other questions, ask away! No such thing as a stupid question, someone here will have an answer... as long as you don't ask why Tyler is ghey
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by mitch cobb racing View Post
    I like my 6.2
    I like 6.3s
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Socal
    Posts
    83
    haha I love this site! You guys down to help me build this thing? I got a friend with a ford thunder bird. He keeps talking shit. Me and a 6.0 need to put him in his place!!

    thanks for all the help. Sounds like its time to start saving for a 6.0 and parts huh?

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    6.0 with milled TFS 235s, ported fast 90 and a 230s cam, 1 7/8 headers, sv0 42lb injectors and you have yourself over 500 rwhp with a good tune
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    6.0 with milled TFS 235s, ported fast 90 and a 230s cam, 1 7/8 headers, sv0 42lb injectors and you have yourself over 500 rwhp with a good tune
    Might as well put L92's on, if you're theory is correct, instead of TFS 235's... TFS 205's would be plenty for a 6.0 and a heavy truck were torque is needed. GM 243's would be perfect, cheaper, and still have room to grow into.
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    Might as well put L92's on, if you're theory is correct, instead of TFS 235's... TFS 205's would be plenty for a 6.0 and a heavy truck were torque is needed. GM 243's would be perfect, cheaper, and still have room to grow into.
    the 205cc would be little small for the 4" bore.
    the TFS 235 on a 6.0 is a proven 500rwhp combo.

    the L92 on a 6.0 is a low 400 proven combo. it takes a ported L92 to just get mid 400s. ported l92 is 260cc which is over kill still with slow port velocity
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    how much would you need to bore a 6.0 to make a 6.2?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts