technology > displacement w/ out technology
displacement w/ technology = no replacement for displacement
6.2 FTW! that thing is gona be a monster Zach!
...and... how can you say that a smaller motor with the same OR older technology will perform better??
were talking about performance, not cost, cause i know the LS3 costs more
Last edited by sprayedenali; 05-18-2009 at 09:19 PM.
01 Silverado
Newer technology is there for a reason. GM didn't spend millions in engineering to build an inferior engine. Just because you don't think its better doesn't mean it isn't. You're comparing 10 year old technology that everyone and their brother has been working to make better vs. an engine thats only been available for two years. I'll bet in 8 years you'll be singing a different tune.
See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709
not everything GM has put money into has been successful. the heads just dont have good velocity for the size of runners. that isnt new technology thats just basic theoryOriginally Posted by RedHeartbeat
Newer technology is there for a reason. GM didn't spend millions in engineering to build an inferior engine. Just because you don't think its better doesn't mean it isn't. You're comparing 10 year old technology that everyone and their brother has been working to make better vs. an engine thats only been available for two years. I'll bet in 8 years you'll be singing a different tune.
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote