well if you can get a 6.0 for close to the same price as a 5.3 why would you choose the 5.3?...
im with dbrods theres no substitute for Cubic Inches
well if you can get a 6.0 for close to the same price as a 5.3 why would you choose the 5.3?...
im with dbrods theres no substitute for Cubic Inches
The 427s are catching up. Now we have 454 and 500" options, too. There are less people that own the large cubic inch engines, so there are less people doing R&D to build to big power.
See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709
yay theres 3 of us that agree on the same thing....its a miracle
Im hoping to see a gain over my previous setup...we will know the 30th. Old setup put down 350 to the wheels.High mileage 5.3 with bolt ons and a small cam
Vortec Performance Tuned
LQ9 built 4L60 LTs and a billion miles on the speedo!
:debates next pissing match topic title:
Thanks for the info guys. Gives me something to think about.
2011 4x4 6.2 Silverado ltz 6" fabtech lift 20" XD spy 35" nitto mud grappler
tisk tisk
THEY CALL ME G.
AZRAEL
2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
2023 300S 5.7
2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]
The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.
6.0 hands down. That is if your going for good power N/A.
that doesnt matter NA or not 6.0 makes more power, i run a 5.3 cus when i do beat a 6.0 its that more satisfying![]()
THEY CALL ME G.
AZRAEL
2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
2023 300S 5.7
2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]
The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.
THEY CALL ME G.
AZRAEL
2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
2023 300S 5.7
2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]
The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.