I was scared to death of doing that. It was really easy.Originally Posted by chevrolade
Mann!!!!i didnt do any research before getting my 112
I just dont like the sound of tapping into oil pan.
I have a Trik Turbo kit and like it but there are a lot of people that have KB kits.
99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.
If you dont want to drill out the pan, look for something like this: Oil Adapter for Turbo
2007 Chevy Silverado Classic 4.3L V6
Magnaflow Muffler, CFM Technologies CNC Machined High Flow Vortec Throttle Blades, STS Rear Turbo, Intercooler, Accell Distributor and Coil, 8mm wire, Autolite Platinum plugs, Runs out of fuel at 4000RPM. Marine intake with larger injectors soon. Hoping to squeeze 10psi.
that is a feed. you have to have that anyway but there is a better place to get it. the hole in the pan is for the oil drain from the turbo.
single digit street truck
for build info
http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...cs-garage.html
The best advice I have ever heard:... Only take B( . Y . )ST advice from someone that is CURRENTLY running a turbo setup close to, or bigger than what you want......
DO IT!!! Turbo Turbo Turbo!
-RJ60'-2.485
1/8-10.324@69.82
1/4-15.88@89.10
Yeah I would say do it. Your gonna be much happier in the end. Your looking at:
42lb injectors
better fuel pump
intercooler
turbo kit
better transmission
meth kit
gauges (if you dont have any)
Id look for a used turbo kit, or do that swap just to save yourself some money
1951 3100
1984 C10
Do it man, you can't go wrong with a turbo kitlook at my truck
i know it cost alot more going turbo but it's alot better in my opinion.
NEW SET UP: HKE 346ci-New times 10.62 @ 131MPH on 16psi
MD-1750-SE Dyno numbers 708-RWHP 762-RWTQ on 16 psi
Old set up Stock 5.3L FI cam and XMS front mount turbo kit
NEW ET 10.82 @ 125 mph 18 psi & 75 shot :-)
MD-1750-SE New XMS Turbo-cam 656 RWHP 696 RWTQ 14 PSI "Got Boost?"
http://i112.photobucket.com/albums/n...persigcopy.png
i would say go with the turbo if u got the money, thats what i would do
i honestly wouldnt waste my time again using 42s on a turbo setup. i got real bored of 9psi and thats about where 42s are limited. I was using Svo 42s and they are 48s unlike marine ones being actual 42s. at 13psi i was at 145 duty cycle on them. granted i spin much higher rpms
if you go turbo step up to 60s, its going to be same price so spend money once
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Yeah I would agree just get the 60s, I mean im only at 77% duty cycle, but I know that Im gonna up the boost and will need more very soon
1951 3100
1984 C10
you at lower rpms arent ya?
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
2K2 Silverado