Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Mark IV big block VS 6.0 or 5.3?

Threaded View

  1. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    315
    Quote Originally Posted by midevil1 View Post
    Well, I put a Musi 502 in my 67 C-10. It made a measley 640rwhp. Lets see a 6.0 or 5.3 do that on 93 octane with no power adder. I would like to see it even with a power adder.LOL. I like my 5.3RC BTW. I just bought an aluminum 5.3 for 350.00 it only had 40,000 miles on it. I kicked around the idea of putting an LS motor in my Pro truck. Nothing makes em shake in the booties like a BB. Especially one that NOW has Twin 88's on it!
    a 502 is not a 396, and the 364 6.0 will easily out perform the 396. the extra 32 cubes is quite a bit, but the gen 3 motors are more efficient. it will take less to get the 6.0 to 400+rwhp then the 396.

    I know the 396 can be punched out, given a roller cam blah blah blah. but a 396 vs. 6.0 the 6.0 is a better engine any day. as far as the bb being intimidating, i've seen alot of loud intimidating cars get killed by 5.0 stangs and ls1/lt1 f-bodies. then they just seemed loud.


    To the OP
    do what you will be proud of owning when its done. the bb is old school and is a beast, the 6.0 is updated and is a beast, the 5.3 is a cruiser that will get you good milage to shows/cruise nights, the ls1 is updated and more costly then any of the other options.
    Last edited by Lsx10; 12-15-2008 at 12:07 AM.
    s10 with 4l60e and cammed 5.3 on the road!THREAD
    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts