+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: cam selection

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wichita falls, tx
    Posts
    3,067

    cam selection

    ive been looking at cams once again, this is what ive come up with, it should have a small thump nothing to radical if im thinking right, ive done alot of reading...and ive noticed the giant cams in pretty much stock motors dont do so well on making power, however they do sound MEAN!, so im thinking i would rather have a little thump and make better all around power instead having a mean sounding stock 5.3 thats all bark and no bite...i do have one question though...the ICL at 110 means this cam would have +2* ground into it right?

    ↓↓↓click pic to go to garage↓↓↓

    408, WCCHL92s, nelson tune,4L80e 3600 Circle D,
    Intro Radicalli's

  2. #2
    Slimsilverado Guest
    I have been looking at that same cam for my 5.3 also. But everyone keeps telling me go bigger but im sot so sure. I was also looking at the 222/224 566/568 on a 112lsa...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    329
    Quote Originally Posted by banker099 View Post
    ...i do have one question though...the ICL at 110 means this cam would have +2* ground into it right?
    Yes, it would be advanced two degrees. If you drive this truck daily, that would be a good cam for a 5.3 engine. It would make power up to about 6000 RPM. If it were me, I would set the ICL at 108 instead of 110. That would give you a little more low-end grunt w/o affecting idle lope. Shift at 5800 RPM.

    Bigger cams require higher RPM levels to make their power. This is not only harder on the engine, but makes lower-RPM, part-throttle performance a little sluggish.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    182
    IMO go bigger. I ran a 6.0 with a 223/226 in a Daily driven 4wd. It was great, but thought about going bigger. Im gonna go a hair bigger (224/226 probably) in my '76
    2000 RCSB Z-71 6l swap 12.8 Gone but not forgotten


    2008 CCSB "tow truck" Slooowwww
    1999 RCSB "WRK TRK" 4.late but getting there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wichita falls, tx
    Posts
    3,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Slimsilverado View Post
    I have been looking at that same cam for my 5.3 also. But everyone keeps telling me go bigger but im sot so sure. I was also looking at the 222/224 566/568 on a 112lsa...

    i want to stay with the smaller cam i think, if i had a bigger motor like the 6.0 i would def go bigger, or even if i had more mods i would go bigger, but i think this should be about the right size foa a daily driver and shouldnt be to bad on mpg and should still make a pretty noticeable difference over a stock cam

    Quote Originally Posted by Madd Maxx View Post
    Yes, it would be advanced two degrees. If you drive this truck daily, that would be a good cam for a 5.3 engine. It would make power up to about 6000 RPM. If it were me, I would set the ICL at 108 instead of 110. That would give you a little more low-end grunt w/o affecting idle lope. Shift at 5800 RPM.

    Bigger cams require higher RPM levels to make their power. This is not only harder on the engine, but makes lower-RPM, part-throttle performance a little sluggish.
    yeah ive seen some that put it at +4*...i probly will go with a 108-109...i would rather have the bottom end power and set shift points about like i do now which is right at 5900
    ↓↓↓click pic to go to garage↓↓↓

    408, WCCHL92s, nelson tune,4L80e 3600 Circle D,
    Intro Radicalli's

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts