+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Flow and Runner Spec's for Stock 5.3L Heads

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ona, W.Va.
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    I knew someone would come back with that one! I think it would actually have to be a 15.4:1CR
    440ci! LS7! Now you're getting expensive.

    I'm looking for 750 ft/lb of torque with this set-up. I want to get it real bad and I think I can with the right cam and a real good tune.

    I mean, I'm making 350HP on a 5.3L with a cam and LT's. Take a 6.7L with a big ole bumpstick and all the air I can scavenge. I might make it... but, if at first you don't succeed, SUPERCHARGE!
    Eric "The" Pyles

    14.06 @ 96mph / 9.02 @ 79mph
    302 RWHP/298 RWTQ


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Quote Originally Posted by SS Killer View Post
    440ci! LS7! Now you're getting expensive.

    I'm looking for 750 ft/lb of torque with this set-up. I want to get it real bad and I think I can with the right cam and a real good tune.

    I mean, I'm making 350HP on a 5.3L with a cam and LT's. 6.7L with a big ole bumpstick and all the air I can scavenge... but, if at first you don't succeed, SUPERCHARGE!
    By the time you build that 6.7L to a high compression and NOT EVEN HAVE 650hp/tq... Take it back apart and lower the compression and add the supercharger... You could have just bought a 440 LS7 and had some money left over to put towards a tranny.
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ona, W.Va.
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    By the time you build that 6.7L to a high compression and NOT EVEN HAVE 650hp/tq... Take it back apart and lower the compression and add the supercharger... You could have just bought a 440 LS7 and had some money left over to put towards a tranny.
    Oh, the tranny's taken care of... it's the next step (before the engine) and will be a stage 4 4L80E from FLT.

    You're right... but say I spend 11k on a LS7 instead of 9,600 on a 6.7L and make right at 700 hp but end up wanting more. Putting the SC on a LS7 would require the same amount of work and possibly more expensive parts.

    It's a proccess. I'm gonna be happy with an N/A 6.7L I think... but if I'm not, there's always the next step.
    Eric "The" Pyles

    14.06 @ 96mph / 9.02 @ 79mph
    302 RWHP/298 RWTQ


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Quote Originally Posted by SS Killer View Post
    Oh, the tranny's taken care of... it's the next step (before the engine) and will be a stage 4 4L80E from FLT.

    You're right... but say I spend 11k on a LS7 instead of 9,600 on a 6.7L and make right at 700 hp but end up wanting more. Putting the SC on a LS7 would require the same amount of work and possibly more expensive parts.

    It's a proccess. I'm gonna be happy with an N/A 6.7L I think... but if I'm not, there's always the next step.
    11K for a LS7? Your talking complete right? (tranny, fuel pump,etc.) 700hp is not going to be street able nor efficient, N/A w/6.7L. Plan on rebuilding that motor every year. There's no replacement for displacement. More cubes will = more hp, less stress on internals, and more HP/TQ. I would have a 402 in mine already but I saw the light and proof.
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ona, W.Va.
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    11K for a LS7? Your talking complete right? (tranny, fuel pump,etc.) 700hp is not going to be street able nor efficient, N/A w/6.7L. Plan on rebuilding that motor every year. There's no replacement for displacement. More cubes will = more hp, less stress on internals, and more HP/TQ. I would have a 402 in mine already but I saw the light and proof.
    I'll get 600Hp out of the 6.7L and be happy for a bit... then when I get restless and want something to do, I'll put a supercharger on it.
    Eric "The" Pyles

    14.06 @ 96mph / 9.02 @ 79mph
    302 RWHP/298 RWTQ


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Don't be afraid to spend money on good heads. I got exactly what I paid for.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    I knew someone would come back with that one! I think it would actually have to be a 15.4:1CR
    haha picky ass arent you! but yea im in complete agreement. 15.4:1 and a steady diet of 106, maybe a pill or too and you should get 700 out of a 6.7
    02 Sierra... motorless for now.
    02 SS.. stock bottom 4.8, 241's, 224-220/116+4, 918's and pushrods, front mount turbonetics 78mm, HKS GTII, TiAL, eBoost2, Yank PT3600, Performabuilt 60e, solid motor mounts. Tuned by me with HP Pro and LM2/AFX

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Quote Originally Posted by RedHeartbeat View Post
    Don't be afraid to spend money on good heads. I got exactly what I paid for.
    Very True! Have you thought about the ported L92's, Greg? SS Killer; If I were you, with what you want to do, wouldn't even consider the 5.3L heads. With 600 HP, your biggest concern is going to be putting that to the pavement and going some where. L92's are cheap and there will be SC's that will mount on top soon with as many LS3's around now.
    Last edited by PurpleMinivan; 03-27-2008 at 07:13 PM.
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

  9. #19
    Slimsilverado Guest
    Remember the L92 heads wont fit on a 5.3 block bore is 2 small!!!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Slimsilverado View Post
    Remember the L92 heads wont fit on a 5.3 block bore is 2 small!!!
    Read it again... he's talking about a 6.0L I would hope, cause you can't bore a 5.3L to a 6.7 without paper thin walls.
    30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts