+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 56

Thread: New Turbo Kit - Nelson Performance

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    489
    Heat inside the engine compartment is like, saying that snow is a concern in the north pole dude

    there million ways to reflect the turbo heat inside the engine comparment. inexpensive that is!!!!!!

    For What I know the syclone/typhoon had a like that setup, and the engine was balance quite well !!!!!!!!

    Just waiting for some test and diving to it !!!!
    Need a Freakin' Roll Cage, and a Death Insurance

  2. #42

    Talking

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Gabe &#064; Oct 17 2006, 07&#58;23 PM) [snapback]69946[/snapback]</div>
    Heat inside the engine compartment is like, saying that snow is a concern in the north pole dude

    there million ways to reflect the turbo heat inside the engine comparment. inexpensive that is&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

    For What I know the syclone/typhoon had a like that setup, and the engine was balance quite well &#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

    Just waiting for some test and diving to it &#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;
    [/b]
    Yeah but a hot turbo glowing red all over the pipes and turbo well nothing else seems to get that hot.
    Just an opinion I really only know enough to make myself out to be a dumba&#036;&#036;

    zeake
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    This may not be the best example, but think of it as this:

    Think of all the piping that is routed to get water to your house. All the turns and connections. Now turn the water on, is there any issue with pressure? No, you&#39;ll have plenty.
    This may be over simplifying, but the exhaust just needs to be pressurized. You could have the wierdest routing for exhaust, bolt a turbo on the end of it and it&#39;s still going to make power.
    Hope this helps, just my opinion of course.

    allen

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Round Rock
    Posts
    1,517
    So you are saying there is more than enough pressure in the system to iver come the small amount of loss the bends in the exhaust prior to the turbo create????

    So including the cost of the setup what are the advantages of having the turbo up front vs in the back..... Yes I just asked that

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    Allen, are they local to SA area?
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(1slow01z71 &#064; Oct 17 2006, 06&#58;52 PM) [snapback]69957[/snapback]</div>
    Allen, are they local to SA area?
    [/b]
    no, kind of far north

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    14
    Nice setup, what stopping someone from making the intercooler piping(custom) and put a front mount on? Where did u get that motor looks like it was involved in a fire or somethin, hehe. Props to Trick Inc. nice work.

  8. #48
    DBYRD Guest
    he sprayed this engine with flat black, there was a post a few days ago that he asked what we thought about it on haha. i was concerned with the engine compartment heat as well, but seeing as ricers do it all the time and they have no probs i dont see why itd make a difference now "thats why they make hoods with heat extractors built in them." as far as how it "looks" personallyt i thought the custom manifold on the pass side looked awesoem and very clean. i think it looks nice, wish it was easier to do to a stock LQ4 but when u got that bolted on its not gonna be "easy" good job overall, cant wait to see the final finished product for stock engines(intercooled). other than pistons and rods, what else on the 6.0 wouldnt hold up to this beast?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    652
    So allen what benefits are there to having the turbo in the front as opposed to in the rear besides costs?
    2004 EXC Silverado 6.2L
    Mods:
    6.2L L92, Ported and Polished stage 3 heads, 95mm Throttle Body, 100mm MAF, NA, Pacesetter LT Headers, Magnaflow X-Pipe Muffler, Electric Fans, 160* thermostat, 2" Drop Shackles, Hellwig Sway Bars Front and Rear, Monroe Reflex Shocks, NGK Spark Plugs, AMW Oil Catch Can, 17"x10" wheels on Kuhmo Tires.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    For starters, oil drainback isn&#39;t an issue. Less &#036;&#036;&#036;&#036; tubing to get the air from the turbo to the intake. No electronics should be necessary for the front turbo. The STS requires a pump and miles of wiring to be hooked up, lots of tubing, clamps and silicone joints.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts