+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 6.2 CC vs 6.0 EC - Who's gonna win?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204

    Smile 6.2 CC vs 6.0 EC - Who's gonna win?

    Friendly showdown going down tonight pending weather.

    2010 6.2 CC 2wd- Headers, exhaust, vararam CAI, mail order tune and 3:73s

    vs

    2004 6.0 LQ9 EC 2wd - Headers, exhaust, DIY ram air to factory box, UD pulley, superchips 93 tune and 3:73s. I believe his previous best was 9.0 in 1/8 with short drag radials (be running 20's tonight).

    Lets hear it.
    Last edited by stngh8r; 04-15-2013 at 12:06 PM.
    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    295
    6.2 ftw
    Should be good for some 8.7-8.9s
    2006 Silverado aka (Bad Bitch)
    K&N CAI, Diablo Predator, muffler delete, and a vette servo. 14.7x @ 93 mph (sold)

    1998 SS Camaro aka (Silver Bullet)
    LS6 intake, ported TB, LTs, ORY, cut out, and a pantie dropping tune by Nelson. 12.6 @ 110 mph 327 hp 347 tq

    2011 ecsb silverado aka (silver sleeper)
    forged 6.2 and a small snail

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    24
    Depends on driver, but I'd say 6.2 has better odds.
    Tony


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    The six two. If the 6.0 would get a real tune it might be closer.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204
    Isn't the 10 CC a lot heavier and less aerodynamic than the 04 EC?
    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    mansfield texas
    Posts
    3,512
    Quote Originally Posted by stngh8r View Post
    Isn't the 10 CC a lot heavier and less aerodynamic than the 04 EC?
    There's aerodynamics in trucks?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by Crazy Blu View Post
    There's aerodynamics in trucks?
    lol, I know what you mean. The 10 sierra does appear to have a much bigger and more blunt front end to push though.
    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    Quote Originally Posted by stngh8r View Post
    Isn't the 10 CC a lot heavier and less aerodynamic than the 04 EC?
    Yes but the horsepower and torque difference is dramatic between the 2 in stock form.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    6.2l, when racing trucks aerodynamics doesnt matter especially in the 1/4, i mean really youll be going 100mph at the big end....maybe
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ponca City
    Posts
    1,606
    6two
    Slowest in Oklahoma...

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts