+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Acceleration

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,229

    Question

    I hope this isn't a repost. Interesting reading for sure!!
    S.C.


    A lesson in acceleration:
    ------------------------------------
    First, some useful info:


    One Top Fuel dragster 500 cubic inch Hemi engine makes more horsepower than the first 4 rows at the Daytona 500.


    Under full throttle, a Top Fuel dragster engine consumes 1½ gallons of nitromethane per second; a fully loaded 747 consumes jet fuel at the same rate with 25% less energy being produced.


    A stock Dodge 426 Hemi V8 engine cannot produce enough power to drive the dragster's supercharger.
    (OF COURSE THEY COULDN'T SAY CHEVY HERE!&#33

    With 3000 CFM of air being rammed in by the supercharger on overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed into a near-solid form before ignition. Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic lock at full throttle.


    At the stoichiometric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for nitromethane the flame front temperature measures 7050 degrees F.


    Nitromethane burns yellow. The spectacular white flame seen above the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen, dissociated from atmospheric water vapor by the searing exhaust gases.


    Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug. This is the output of an arc welder in each cylinder.


    Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed during a pass. After 1/2 way, the engine is dieseling from compression plus the glow of exhaust valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be shut down by cutting the fuel flow.


    If spark momentarily fails early in the run, unburned nitro builds up in the affected cylinders and then explodes with sufficient force to blow cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split the block in half.


    In order to exceed 300 mph in 4.5 seconds dragsters must accelerate at an average of over 4G's. In order to reach 200 mph well before half-track, the launch acceleration approaches 8G's.


    Dragsters reach over 300 miles per hour before you have completed reading this sentence.


    Top Fuel Engines turn approximately 540 revolutions from light to light!


    Including the burnout the engine must only survive 900 revolutions under load.


    The red-line is actually quite high at 9500 rpm.


    The Bottom Line; Assuming all the equipment is paid off, the crew worked for free, and for once NOTHING BLOWS UP, each run costs an estimated $1,000.00 per second. The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is 4.441 seconds for the quarter mile (10/05/03, Tony Schumacher). The top speed record is 333.00 mph (533 km/h) as measured over the last 66' of the run (09/28/03 Doug Kalitta).


    Putting all of this into perspective:


    You are riding the average $250,000 Honda MotoGP bike. Over a mile up the road, a Top Fuel dragster is staged and ready to launch down a quarter mile strip as you pass. You have the advantage of a flying start. You run the RC211V hard up through the gears and blast across the starting line and past the dragster at an honest 200 mph (293 ft/sec). The 'tree' goes green for both of you at that moment. The dragster launches and starts after you. You keep your wrist cranked hard, but you hear an incredibly brutal whine that sears your eardrums and within 3 seconds the dragster catches and passes you. He beats you to the finish line, a quarter mile away from where you just passed him.


    Think about it, from a standing start, the dragster had spotted you 200 mph and not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the road when he passed you within a mere 1320 foot long race course.


    That, folks, is acceleration.

    Gone, but not forgotten!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Round Rock
    Posts
    1,517
    Those numbers just put my feeble mind in failure mode........
    08 HHR SS
    Black on Black 5 spd with no options


    Pics of Christine, the '05 VHO My Car Domain Site

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    springfield MO
    Posts
    226
    I had seen that before but enjoyed reading it again. That is interesting and fun stuff...
    Dave
    1968 Chevy SWB Fleet. 2002 5.3 all stock (for now ) Nelson Tune 4l60e w/TB converter.
    ok not stock anymore...13.3 at 101
    Now with front mount turbo... new times soon

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    I need a bigger cam.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    What is most amazing to me is that they will still get more powerful and faster in the coming years! I like the fact that no tranny is used, only a series of clutches.
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GMCwantsLS1 &#064; Jun 28 2006, 05&#58;21 PM) [snapback]56547[/snapback]</div>
    What is most amazing to me is that they will still get more powerful and faster in the coming years&#33; I like the fact that no tranny is used, only a series of clutches.
    [/b]
    Yeah, that started about 15 years ago with Texas legend Gene Snow. He started it and proved that it would work, now everyone does it.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Anthony, Indiana
    Posts
    1,592
    very interesting

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    simply amazing.

    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    383
    Interesting stuff. I don&#39;t understand the 540 revolutions from light to light? 900 under load. Are they saying that the engine only turns 540 complete revolutions thru the quarter mile?

    03 Chevy ECSB, Z71, 6.0L(LQ4), Maggie @ 9PSI, 4l80E, PI Vig 2800, Detroit True-Trac, 4.10, 90mm LS2 TB, Meth Injection, HSW Dry N20, LPE GT7 Cam, 918 springs, Dynatech LT's, Hi Flow cats, custom stainless exhaust, DMH cutouts, DJM Suspension Drop, E-Fans, AirAid, HPT 2Bar SD Tuned, 11.68 @ 114.2

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Yeah, if you break it down that far. 9000 rpm is only 150 rev/second. Run hard 5 seconds and that 750 revs. Add in a partial throttle burnout for 3 seconds with the butterflies locked and lower revs/second and the numbers add up. It doesn&#39;t count all the idling and reverse time and staging revs.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts