i thought it wouldnt work on 317,243 heads and such only the ls3 heads, anyway i witnessed one sunday, the guy was telling me about it and so i had to look yep l92 intake on a set of 317 casting heads!!!!
i thought it wouldnt work on 317,243 heads and such only the ls3 heads, anyway i witnessed one sunday, the guy was telling me about it and so i had to look yep l92 intake on a set of 317 casting heads!!!!
Simple: 408 on steroids!
single digits coming soon!
Are you sure? The port spacings on L92 heads are different than 243/317 heads. IOW, the intake runners don't line up with L92 intakes and 317 heads.
Simple: 408 on steroids!
single digits coming soon!
Simple: 408 on steroids!
single digits coming soon!
Most likely it's the tbss intake, It looks very similar to the L92 and... If I'm not mistaken the L92 heads are a few degrees off from the 317, 243, etc.etc. heads which wouldn't work when trying to bolt up the L92 intake to the earlier heads.
30' Ford Model A Tudor Sedan - Custom chassis - Big bore LS2 - twin B76's - Glide - 9" w/ 3.07 gears - 30" DR tire - 2k lbs cruiser
Simple: 408 on steroids!
single digits coming soon!
Yeah, I thought the LS1 style cathedral ports were too tall to seal the LS3/L92 intake port. I guess if you epoxied the intake runner you could put one on there but then you'd really want to try and port match all the intake runners to the intake.
See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709