+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: LQ4 or LQ9

  1. #1

    LQ4 or LQ9

    Let's say I wanted to swap a 6.0 into a NBS 1500, with plans to build the motor to 500-800HP. Which would be better, the LQ4 or LQ9 and why?

    (this is assuming the LQ9 is going to cost more)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,429
    Nitrous? S/C? Turbo?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    A salvage yard LQ9 is going to cost more due to the fact that there aren't as many available as LQ4's. LQ9 has more HP, better rods and higher compression.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by DBTBSS View Post
    Nitrous? S/C? Turbo?
    I have no idea yet, but probably a super charger or turbo. Definitely not Nitrous.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gramercy
    Posts
    945
    LQ4 would be best for a FI lower compression is best for that. LQ9 is best for staying NA if im correct.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by keniff View Post
    LQ4 would be best for a FI lower compression is best for that. LQ9 is best for staying NA if im correct.
    What is FI and NA?


    Any other input???

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by EastCoast1st View Post
    What is FI and NA?


    Any other input???
    FI = Forced Induction (SC or Turbo)
    NA = Naturally Aspirated (Cubic Inches, Raw Motor)

    I'd go with the LQ9, if you ever add a turbo, swap the heads to raise lower compression to whatever you need. LQ9's run about $1k used on ebay, $2.5k rebuild.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Vicinity View Post
    FI = Forced Induction (SC or Turbo)
    NA = Naturally Aspirated (Cubic Inches, Raw Motor)

    I'd go with the LQ9, if you ever add a turbo, swap the heads to raise lower compression to whatever you need. LQ9's run about $1k used on ebay, $2.5k rebuild.
    The only difference between the LQ9 and LQ4 is the pistons. LQ4 has dished and LQ9 has flat tops, heads are the same. Compression on a LQ4 is around 9.4 and LQ9 is 9.9. You could still run a turbo on a LQ9 but you wouldn't be able to run as much boost as the LQ4 due to the overall compression ratio or dynamic CR. It's the age old question: Higher CR and less boost, or lower CR and more boost.

    I would go with the LQ4 since they are cheaper to begin with. To reach those HP goals, you're going to probably want to go forged internals anyway. Get a couple T-76's (turbos) on there and make your 800rwhp.

    The other option would be to get the LQ9, forged internals, nasty cam, worked heads and spray the piss out of it. Just depends on what you prefer.

    2004 Silverado Crew Cab, forged iron 5.7, STS w/MP turbo, 10+ psi, FMIC, Tial 50mm BOV, Vic Jr, Snow performance meth, MTI Stealth cam .220/.220 .581/.581 115lsa, Comp chromoly pushrods, Yank TT3000 stall, LS1 Efans, 160 tstat, Trucool 40k trans cooler, 60# injectors, Walbro fuel pump, Patriot springs, Built 4l65E w/billet input & output shafts, Eaton posi, SD tuned...all installed by Klein North Automotive

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Roma, Texas
    Posts
    219
    i have the gen-III lq9 on my 2000 xcab and the gen IV-ly6-iron block 6.0 on my 2007, if you want to be over the 500hp zone you should go forged or stroker. the lq4s and lq9 that my team owns are in the mid to low 12s motor and one whole sec less on nos.
    [CENTER]
    GLADIATOR 6.0 2007 nnbs chevy 13.2 1/4mi. busting my drive shaft at 106 mph before the finish line
    CHEATER 6.0 2000 gmc xcab lq9 fully bolt on 12.52 motor and 11.62 n2o.
    http://youtu.be/UV-I1mlKcTI

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    98
    I was wondering a bit myself.


    I just recently found a pretty cheap LQ9 longblock out of an '06 Escalade that I should be going to pick up tomorrow.


    At this point I'm not sure if I want to go with forged internals or not (my wallets not that deep at the moment). But, if this was a route one was to take, it seems that you'd end up with the same results whether it is an LQ4 or an LQ9 that you began with, correct? I've been assuming same iron block?
    (this would also bring up a related question, which is the best route to go for forged internals?)

    Also, I thought I remember reading somewhere that after '05 something was changed in them, possibly the rods? Anything else? Can anyone confirm with details?

    And, what head castings were paired up with these engines throughout the years? As far as I know, 862's and 317's. Any others? Differences? Which is the preferrable casting?

    Thanks in advance for the input.
    Last edited by ShredSled; 08-24-2009 at 11:21 PM.
    Shralp' it heavy.

    \\ '02 Sierra \V/ '01 Silvy //

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts