+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 56

Thread: Kicking around the idea of a 6.0/6speed conversion

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(6gear &#064; Oct 25 2006, 12&#58;39 PM) [snapback]71070[/snapback]</div>
    My truck was orginally a 4.8 5 speed and I went to the LS1 with a 6 speed and it was a very easy conversion. You can use the hydraulic line from your current setup and it will plug into the slave cylinder on the 6 speed, you crossmember should fit perfect with no mods you will just need a shorter driveshaft and lower gears in the back.
    [/b]
    I&#39;m glad you did this. We&#39;ve (Allen and I) been thinking about that exact swap for years and figured it would be a real easy swap. I always figured you could pick up a base model truck with a 4.8 and 5 speed for a good price and make a screaming hotrod truck out of it. Nice job&#33;
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    147
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SBTork &#064; Oct 23 2006, 11&#58;41 PM) [snapback]70881[/snapback]</div>
    I&#39;ve got an 06 rclb and im thinking of doing a 6.0 6 speed conversion once the warranty is up. I think I have a good idea of the depth of the V6 to V8 swap, but I know nothing about putting a 6 speed in one. The truck right now has a 5 speed so all the pedals and lines are there, I&#39;m just not sure if everything will hook up the same. I know it&#39;ll be a hard task to overtake but if I do my homework in the next 2 1/2 years I think I can get a good handle on it. If anyone has done a 6 speed converion or a 6 liter swap, please chime in with any comments or suggestions.
    [/b]



    Put a T56 in it. They are a blast to drive,
    I have a 5.3/T56 combo in a 92 fullsize.
    You already have the hydraulics so that part is easy.
    As stated above, Keisler makes a kit that will allow you to move the shifter forward and should make it possible to maintain a stock look on the inside.
    I have their shifter relocation kit, and only had to trim about a 1/2 out of the original hole in the cab floor.

    I agree, you will need lower rear gears. I have 4.56 in mine.

    Good luck
    '92 Fullsize, swb rc
    5.3L/T56 conversion, comp XR275 HR cam .566/.568 lift 222/224 duration 112 lsa, crane dual springs, trick flow push rods, K&N Filter, Nelson Performance tune, Keisler shifter relocation kit, Boyd Coddington Smoothie II 18x8 235/55 up front, 18x10 295/45 out back, 2/4 drop, eaton lsd w/4.56 gears

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LaCrosse, WI
    Posts
    106
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(6gear &#064; Oct 25 2006, 12&#58;39 PM) [snapback]71070[/snapback]</div>
    My truck was orginally a 4.8 5 speed and I went to the LS1 with a 6 speed and it was a very easy conversion. You can use the hydraulic line from your current setup and it will plug into the slave cylinder on the 6 speed, you crossmember should fit perfect with no mods you will just need a shorter driveshaft and lower gears in the back.
    [/b]
    That&#39;s the support I was looking for man, thanks for the info&#33;

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pnhigg &#064; Oct 25 2006, 06&#58;19 PM) [snapback]71138[/snapback]</div>
    Put a T56 in it. They are a blast to drive,
    I have a 5.3/T56 combo in a 92 fullsize.
    You already have the hydraulics so that part is easy.
    As stated above, Keisler makes a kit that will allow you to move the shifter forward and should make it possible to maintain a stock look on the inside.
    I have their shifter relocation kit, and only had to trim about a 1/2 out of the original hole in the cab floor.

    I agree, you will need lower rear gears. I have 4.56 in mine.

    Good luck
    [/b]
    Thanks again man, I figure ill have to do something to strengthen the rear end anyway, so gears will now be a must. How is your mileage with the 4.56&#39;s? I was thinking along the lines of a 3.90, or a 4.10.
    '82 C-10......project truck.....

  4. #14
    DBYRD Guest
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SBTork &#064; Oct 25 2006, 11&#58;02 PM) [snapback]71203[/snapback]</div>
    That&#39;s the support I was looking for man, thanks for the info&#33;
    Thanks again man, I figure ill have to do something to strengthen the rear end anyway, so gears will now be a must. How is your mileage with the 4.56&#39;s? I was thinking along the lines of a 3.90, or a 4.10.
    [/b]
    im not sure ud lose that much, usually he most ud lose is 1-3 MPG on gear swaps. if u going with this setup, would gas mileage be a concern. i understand that everyone wants the best driveability possible, but for what u lose in gears u can make up for on other things(CAI, synthetics, etc...). i think ud definitely get around 16-20MPG easily. the way u drive will ultimately determine ur gas mileage, but thats a no brainer haha

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LaCrosse, WI
    Posts
    106
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Allstar55566 &#064; Oct 26 2006, 12&#58;18 AM) [snapback]71210[/snapback]</div>
    im not sure ud lose that much, usually he most ud lose is 1-3 MPG on gear swaps. if u going with this setup, would gas mileage be a concern. i understand that everyone wants the best driveability possible, but for what u lose in gears u can make up for on other things(CAI, synthetics, etc...). i think ud definitely get around 16-20MPG easily. the way u drive will ultimately determine ur gas mileage, but thats a no brainer haha
    [/b]
    very true, mileage is not the main concern, but it&#39;s still a concern. I like the fact that a GTO with a 6.0 gets 28 on the highway, power and mileage is the main driving force behind this idea. I did not know that the gears only hurt mileage that much, it may not be that big of a deal all said and done. Thanks man.
    '82 C-10......project truck.....

  6. #16
    DBYRD Guest
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SBTork &#064; Oct 26 2006, 12&#58;41 AM) [snapback]71212[/snapback]</div>
    very true, mileage is not the main concern, but it&#39;s still a concern. I like the fact that a GTO with a 6.0 gets 28 on the highway, power and mileage is the main driving force behind this idea. I did not know that the gears only hurt mileage that much, it may not be that big of a deal all said and done. Thanks man.
    [/b]
    yeah no problem, ill try to find some posts to back it up, but ur not gonna be pulling the MPG down too bad. like i said its more the way u drive it after the mods r done thats will affect that. a lot of people get mods done and stomp on it all the time cuz its intrguing, but then they complain about gas mileage. the parts dont causes that huge of a gap, ur not gonna go form 20mpg to like 13 just by doing gears. itd be more of a change in ur driving habit that would cause the change.

    EDIT: tired of looking through posts haha theres info on it just have to search and find them. i did find some posts in the t56 just hit the search button up top and type keywords liek "T56" and "gears" and ull be fine.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    147
    Honestly I am not exactly sure what kind of milage I am getting right now.
    My speedo is still not calibrated correctly, and haven&#39;t had time to change it.
    Also my truck is not a daily driver, just a toy, so I didn&#39;t assemble it with efficiency in mind.
    It has a mild cam, and a tune from Allen.
    I had in mind going with 4.10 but found an Eaton posi unit with 4.56 gears on Ebay, and bought them to try.
    I&#39;m glad I did.
    For a daily driver, 4.10 would be fine, buy I would not go lower, just my opinion.

    FYI I can run about 70mph in 6th at about 2000rpm with plenty of power left.

    My original gears were 3.08 and when I switched to the 4.56 the seat of the pants difference was about as significant as changing from the original 4.3 to the 5.3.

    Good luck
    '92 Fullsize, swb rc
    5.3L/T56 conversion, comp XR275 HR cam .566/.568 lift 222/224 duration 112 lsa, crane dual springs, trick flow push rods, K&N Filter, Nelson Performance tune, Keisler shifter relocation kit, Boyd Coddington Smoothie II 18x8 235/55 up front, 18x10 295/45 out back, 2/4 drop, eaton lsd w/4.56 gears

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    North Central Arkansas, Cave City
    Posts
    279
    I am going to say don&#39;t even consider anything less than 4.56. I started out with factory 3.42 and then tried 4.11 but now have 4.56. With a 29" tire I can run about 80 at 2000 rpm&#39;s in 6th. I drove on a 750 mile trip one way and got 19.888 mpg running between 80 and 90 mph.
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...nstruckls1.jpg

    05 Joe Gibbs RCSB 5 gear
    99 Vette / 6 gear
    02 Honda Goldwing
    00 Hayabusa

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LaCrosse, WI
    Posts
    106
    excellent info guys, thanks
    '82 C-10......project truck.....

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Socialist Union of Canada
    Posts
    368
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(pnhigg &#064; Oct 25 2006, 07&#58;19 PM) [snapback]71138[/snapback]</div>
    I have a 5.3/T56 combo in a 92 fullsize.
    [/b]

    Is your truck a rcsb or an ecsb?

    ps. Any pics of the interior?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts