+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 64

Thread: thoughts on flowmaster super 10's

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    There was a joke about my truck having "world ending" exhaust when I had my Spintech. It does sound amazing. It's sounds completely different from anything else. Flowmaster 10s sound like garbage compared to a Spintech.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMXhOyO9K5Y

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeSwpMERbiM
    Last edited by pl4yboy; 04-10-2013 at 08:51 PM.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    you realize there are different variations of flowmasters that perform diffently then other flow masters
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbum View Post
    flowmasters are loud, drone, and don't flow that well. a quality straight through muffler like a dynomax ultraflow or magnaflow will run circles around a flowmaster, and the wrapped perforated tube design really resists droning like a chambered muffler does. my single 3" magnaflow is very mild under normal driving loads and screams at WOT, and has such a smooth refined tone.
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    FYI ive done dyno testing of a spintech setup and it sure chokes it up vs a straight thru muffler....wouldnt catch me using a spintech
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  4. #14
    he said super 10 series, which are a garbage cheapy one chambered muffler that doesn't flow worth a crap....much like the spintech mufflers

    had a buddy go from a spintech to an ultraflow and picked up 6mph...that's a ton of hp.
    2000 ECSB Silverado 2wd 5.3/4l60e. basically stock
    1990 Camaro 5.3/t56...not as stock
    1971 Chevelle ls6 cammed 5.3/700r4 turbo build.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbum View Post
    he said super 10 series, which are a garbage cheapy one chambered muffler that doesn't flow worth a crap....much like the spintech mufflers

    had a buddy go from a spintech to an ultraflow and picked up 6mph...that's a ton of hp.
    thats hard to believe...not one muffler out there is going to gain you 60 rwhp
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  6. #16
    well, it's in a thirdgen camaro, so not sure that 6mph is 60rwhp since it's not a 5000 pound tank
    2000 ECSB Silverado 2wd 5.3/4l60e. basically stock
    1990 Camaro 5.3/t56...not as stock
    1971 Chevelle ls6 cammed 5.3/700r4 turbo build.

  7. #17
    2000 ECSB Silverado 2wd 5.3/4l60e. basically stock
    1990 Camaro 5.3/t56...not as stock
    1971 Chevelle ls6 cammed 5.3/700r4 turbo build.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Still not believable.....

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by George C View Post
    Still not believable.....
    you don't have to believe it. he did it, and i saw all the data from before and after. only thing i don't think we took into account was DA. but you're not going to pick up 9mph going from a terrible air quality day to a great air quality day...even in GA where you can have 4000' DA in the summer, and -1000' DA in the fall/spring.

    anyway, chambered mufflers are not performance mufflers. i picked up 2 mph going from a moroso spiral race muffler(chambered) to a dynomax bullet(straight through) on my car.

    maybe i need 6000+ posts before i can add to conversation around here and be taken seriously
    2000 ECSB Silverado 2wd 5.3/4l60e. basically stock
    1990 Camaro 5.3/t56...not as stock
    1971 Chevelle ls6 cammed 5.3/700r4 turbo build.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    Quote Originally Posted by thirdgenbum View Post
    you don't have to believe it. he did it, and i saw all the data from before and after. only thing i don't think we took into account was DA. but you're not going to pick up 9mph going from a terrible air quality day to a great air quality day...even in GA where you can have 4000' DA in the summer, and -1000' DA in the fall/spring.

    anyway, chambered mufflers are not performance mufflers. i picked up 2 mph going from a moroso spiral race muffler(chambered) to a dynomax bullet(straight through) on my car.

    maybe i need 6000+ posts before i can add to conversation around here and be taken seriously
    9mph on a muffler delete? Come on.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts