cam suggestions

[lukecibilich]

idk if these things will totaly contradict eachother but this is want i want

kinda smooth, not too rough idle
ok.. with stock verter but best with a 2600-2800
power past 6k to pull hard up top
future plans are N/A with a small chance N20 later

i wanted a tr220 114 but did't want a 3000stall or bigger



and my mods
-5.3
-cai
-p&p + bypassed tb
-e-fans
-Japanese lt's
-dynomax 3" side exit
-shift kit + servo
-trans cooler
-3.90's w/ trutrac
-live tune

[motorholmes]

Imo you wouldn't need a 3000 with a tr220

[lukecibilich]

What stall would you recommend? I'm not really concerned too much about low end. I just don't want the power band to die early like it does now

[WARLOCK]

2600-2800 would be fine with the tr220....some run it with the stock stall but dont reap all the benefits.

[lukecibilich]

i'm probably getting the 220 and a 2800 stall, but don't know which lsa to get. 112 or 114. how much does that 2 degrees change the hp and sound

[banker099]

112lsa will move your powerband up in the rpm range, and will idle rougher, 114 will have the more smooth idle you are looking for and have peak power lower in the rpm range

[lukecibilich]

yeah i realized that, i want to know how much different ?

[Madd Maxx]

112lsa will move your powerband up in the rpm range, . . .

You have this part backwards. A narrower LSA causes the intake closing to occur sooner, which moves the the powerband down. However, within the powerband, the power will peak a little higher due to the increased overlap caused by the narrower LSA.

[Madd Maxx]

yeah i realized that, i want to know how much different ?

Not enough that you would notice a performance difference. The cam specs are too similar. The slightly higher peak power of the 112 LSA will be offset by the slightly broader power curve of the 114 LSA. The only difference you would notice would be the slightly lopier idle of the 112 LSA.

[lukecibilich]

thanks ill just do the 114, should get the stall first or should i do the cam first?