Pretty interesting reading:

[graysilverado5.3]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(txarkitekt &#064; Apr 30 2007, 01&#58;00 PM) [snapback]91831[/snapback]</div>

Quite interesting indeed. And I just put on a 160# t-stat....damnit. Oh well... I can always put the stocker back on if I need to...
[/b]

I installed a tb stall and the 160* thermostat and i lost significant MPG. Anyone think its the 160* thats causing the MPG to decrease??

[txarkitekt]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(graysilverado5.3 &#064; Apr 30 2007, 05&#58;48 PM) [snapback]91856[/snapback]</div>

I installed a tb stall and the 160* thermostat and i lost significant MPG. Anyone think its the 160* thats causing the MPG to decrease??
[/b]

IMO, I think that the stall is what is killing your mpg. The TB stall is a 2600? I am only going on prior knowledge--I could be wrong on that figure. Anytime you enlist a higher than stock stall, you will be revving your motor 1000-2000 rpms higher (depending upon specific applications) in certain gears. Since you are running higher rpms, you are wasting more gas. A higher stall puts your motor right in the beef of the power curve---your motor makes the most power, and uses a lot more gas at that point. I would venture to say that a 160 t-stat allows your motor to run slightly cooler, decreasing the notion of detonation, not allowing the stock fan clutch to engage, allowing better atomization of fuel/air, and to keep timing efficient. With that said, it should keep the motor running more efficiently. Just my ...

[graysilverado5.3]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(txarkitekt &#064; May 1 2007, 08&#58;44 AM) [snapback]91924[/snapback]</div>

IMO, I think that the stall is what is killing your mpg. The TB stall is a 2600? I am only going on prior knowledge--I could be wrong on that figure. Anytime you enlist a higher than stock stall, you will be revving your motor 1000-2000 rpms higher (depending upon specific applications) in certain gears. Since you are running higher rpms, you are wasting more gas. A higher stall puts your motor right in the beef of the power curve---your motor makes the most power, and uses a lot more gas at that point. I would venture to say that a 160 t-stat allows your motor to run slightly cooler, decreasing the notion of detonation, not allowing the stock fan clutch to engage, allowing better atomization of fuel/air, and to keep timing efficient. With that said, it should keep the motor running more efficiently. Just my ...
[/b]

There are people with bigger stalls, and bigger cams than mine and they get better gas mileage than me. A tb stall is really a stock stall if you think about it. Its what comes stock on a trailblazer. If it was a bigger stall i would understand about the gas mileage, not its not a big stall.