+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Tundra does 14.6@93.6!!!!

  1. #11
    It still isn't fast enough to beat my truck. I don't think.
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    TeXas
    Posts
    932
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(zeake &#064; Mar 6 2007, 09&#58;18 PM) [snapback]85509[/snapback]</div>
    It still isn&#39;t fast enough to beat my truck. I don&#39;t think.
    [/b]
    they do make a S/C for them all ready.
    http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b9...5831PM-2-1.jpg <--- TimeSlip
    RCSB 5.3 N/A 12.31 full boltons,H/C,4.10s,3800 converter. SOLD
    04 GTO
    Both Tuned By: ME

  3. #13
    DBYRD Guest
    they are ugly for one thing, and two look at the GM aftermarket compared to theirs. i dont see any of these trucks on the road and u cant say its cuz there is a limited amount i mean the new silverados already outnumber them on the road and they havent bee out long at all. chevy hasnt even begun to get busy with the new trucks yet, look for more standard power than any other truck out soon.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204
    I agree the Tundra&#39;s are ugly.

    vv8 is correct, you can get a rcsb Tundra&#33;

    I realize the LS1 based engine makes good power and I am a Chevy fan, but I have to admit, this Tundra is making some amazing power right off the show room floor. Its going to take many mods just to catch up and then hope that the Tundra doesnt up the ante with mods themselves.

    It wasnt that long ago the Lightning came out and was by far the fastest most powerful fullsize truck to date. How much power was it making? Like 385hp or something? So, what was only limited edition/performance package power ~7years ago, is now available in your run of the mill N/A Toyota p/u?? Its just amazing to me that in such a short period of time, how much the horsepower has gone up across the board.

    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204
    Came across this comparison concerning the Silverado, Tundra and Titan. Very interesting, informative and well written.

    This link is to the Dyno testing page, for other pages, look for the clickies on the upper left hand of the page.

    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drive...1/pageId=118457
    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(stngh8r &#064; Mar 7 2007, 09&#58;30 AM) [snapback]85577[/snapback]</div>
    I agree the Tundra&#39;s are ugly.

    vv8 is correct, you can get a rcsb Tundra&#33;

    I realize the LS1 based engine makes good power and I am a Chevy fan, but I have to admit, this Tundra is making some amazing power right off the show room floor. Its going to take many mods just to catch up and then hope that the Tundra doesnt up the ante with mods themselves.

    It wasnt that long ago the Lightning came out and was by far the fastest most powerful fullsize truck to date. How much power was it making? Like 385hp or something? So, what was only limited edition/performance package power ~7years ago, is now available in your run of the mill N/A Toyota p/u?? Its just amazing to me that in such a short period of time, how much the horsepower has gone up across the board.
    [/b]
    My point exactly - just too lazy to type that much.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Azle,TX
    Posts
    3,682
    Im sure the goverment will step in pretty quick....just like in the late 60s early 70s
    Vortec Performance Tuned
    LQ9 built 4L60 LTs and a billion miles on the speedo!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    It&#39;s a HP war out there and it&#39;s just getting stronger; it would be the same thing if GM put the LS6/LS2 in their trucks, 400hp.
    I&#39;d love to see GM put the new 6.2L in a 1/2 truck, or at least the 6L and not weigh it down with 1,000lbs in options, lol.

    Has anyone see the 427SS rcsb at the shows? That would be awesome&#33;

    later,
    allen

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    McCurtain County, OK
    Posts
    226
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(stngh8r &#064; Mar 7 2007, 09&#58;30 AM) [snapback]85577[/snapback]</div>
    I agree the Tundra&#39;s are ugly.
    [/b]

    I would rather be driving your jeep than a tundra
    <><
    2004 ECSB Silverado LQ9 6.0L Superchips;14.0 @ 96: 4900lbs of Fun

    69 Chevelle Coupe LS1/A4 swap

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    163
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(vv8 &#064; Mar 6 2007, 09&#58;32 PM) [snapback]85501[/snapback]</div>
    I built one rcsb 5.7 6 speed 28,500 there ya go.
    [/b]
    I don&#39;t know what the hell I was doing but I built a rcsb. Still ugly and will never buy one.
    2015 GMC Sierra RCSB Z71 5.3

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts