+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: lt1 or 6.0?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Provo Utah
    Posts
    33
    Well I am in a dilemma. I have a 1990 chevy pickup that I had a 383 lt1 stroker motor in. I ended up blowing up 4 pistons so I tore it down and had all the machine work done to it and new pistons installed. In the meantime I ended up buying a 6.0 and trans, 2800 stall as well as a z06 cam and springs. I had decide to run this to be a little more driveable without the headaches. My dilemma is I am about to put the truck back together and I am not sure what to do. i am afraid if I use the 6.0 I will be very dissapointed in the power compared to the 450 horse 383. What are your guys' thoughts on this? Your input would be greatly appreciated.

    Shawn

  2. #2
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(sevans &#064; Jan 4 2007, 10&#58;13 PM) [snapback]78357[/snapback]</div>
    Well I am in a dilemma. I have a 1990 chevy pickup that I had a 383 lt1 stroker motor in. I ended up blowing up 4 pistons so I tore it down and had all the machine work done to it and new pistons installed. In the meantime I ended up buying a 6.0 and trans, 2800 stall as well as a z06 cam and springs. I had decide to run this to be a little more driveable without the headaches. My dilemma is I am about to put the truck back together and I am not sure what to do. i am afraid if I use the 6.0 I will be very dissapointed in the power compared to the 450 horse 383. What are your guys&#39; thoughts on this? Your input would be greatly appreciated.

    Shawn
    [/b]
    6.0l is the better engine.
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Marcos Texas
    Posts
    4,393
    Go with the 6.0L setup, you won&#39;t be disapointed.
    2006 Superior Blue Trailblazer SS AWD, Stock as a rock

    Sold: 2002 GMC Sportside Denali front end with a 2002 LS1, FLT level 5, Yank 2600, Trick Turbo, T76, Nelson intercooler, 60LB injectors, Warbro fuel pump, Eaton locker, Magnaflow, 3.42, Nelson Performance Tuning (speed density).

    Sold: 1981 GMC LB RC 1500 2002 4.8L 4L60E 12 bolt 3.73 Richmond Lock Right AC PS Nelson Performance tuning

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Plano, TX
    Posts
    230
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(zeake &#064; Jan 8 2007, 07&#58;42 PM) [snapback]78763[/snapback]</div>
    6.0l is the better engine.[/b]
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GMCwantsLS1 &#064; Jan 8 2007, 08&#58;49 PM) [snapback]78778[/snapback]</div>
    Go with the 6.0L setup, you won&#39;t be disapointed.[/b]
    Stick with your original 6.0L plan.

    Mr. P.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Waco TX
    Posts
    3,113
    6.0L
    DANIEL CAMMED SS 13.46 @ 98.17-- 8.58 @ 80.31

    2003 Silverado SS / LQ9 6.0L / Wheatley 93 Octane Tune / 224/228 .581 .588 110lsa / Patriot Gold Dual Springs / Comp Hardened Push Rods / Circle D 3800 stall / Pacesetter LT's / 4:10 Gears / Transgo HD-2 Shift Kit / K & N Cold Air Intake / Corvette Servo / Aeroforce Interceptor / Autometer Narrorband(Wideband on the way) / Mobile 1 Synthetic / Single Chamber Flows with X Pipe / Cats Delete with Cutouts


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    drinking your alcohol
    Posts
    2,967
    six point OHHH
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    lol...I wish you would never paint your truck...I bet it bugs them that much more that a primered up truck just soggied his Wheaties. good job buddy
    sprayedenali: i like catching, but not fishing
    DBTBSS: bring Tyler... we need someone to make fun of
    MidnightRider: your right im gay
    DamnYankee: my nana failed
    DamnYankee: confused...if it can't keep up to begin with, how can it keep up
    mitch cobb racing: ya, allen played with it for a while, HUGE difference

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    56
    The 6.0 should be right up there power wise with the 383. I have the 6.0 in my SS and it&#39;s either that or a big block for me.


    Dave
    2003 Silverado SS here&#39;s where my money went...Radix @ 9psi, Vortec IC tank, Oversized Heat exchanger, ASM LT Headers, Suncoast Ram Air hood, Airaid intake, Trailblazer Torque converter, Full billet servos, Zippy kit, cat-free, Flowmaster muffler, Gaylord Speedstur tonneau, 3/4 drop with Belltech spindles and leafs, Sirius conversion & MTX thunderform sub box. 05 e-fans coming soon&#33;

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    Dont listen to these chumps, LT1 ALL THE WAY BABY&#33;

    "YOU BOYS LIKE MEXICO?&#33; WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    OKC, Oklahoma
    Posts
    69
    This is a bad site for an unbiased opinion. LT1 is a good motor... A good, yet dated motor. The 6.0L is a better motor if you ask me, or most anyone else on this site (except ducky it seems). But again we are kind of biased this is LS1truck.com not LT1Truck.com


    Also, I&#39;ve seen a couple LT1&#39;s that have an issue with deep water due to the location/design of the distributer on the newer style LT&#39;s. Sence you are a Z71 possibly an offroad guy this may concern you. However because the made this motor for like 40 years it may not lol.
    2004 Chevy/Regency RST, 6.0L LQ4, custom built NV MG-5 tranny by local Tranny Guru, Hurst Shifter, K&N FIPK, stock Regnecy Exhaust, 3.73 gears w/ Eaton Locker, and the Magnacharger huffer topping it off w/ stock pulley... for now

    Looking to meet people w/ LS1 trucks in the OKC area PM me

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts