hopefully they wont all come with the gay ass T56. but yea that's a bad ass truck.
http://blogs.edmunds.com/.ee95666
![]()
hopefully they wont all come with the gay ass T56. but yea that's a bad ass truck.
http://blogs.edmunds.com/.ee95666
![]()
2007 Victory (Polaris) Hammer 100ci/6spd/stepped pipes/power commander/torque tube intake/lowered
2010 Malibu 3.6vvt
2000 Formula, 6.0, LS3 heads, stall, etc, etc - SOLD
2008 CCSB 4.8 - SOLD
2003 2500HD 6.0, long tubes - SOLD
1999 ECSB 5.3, cam, stall, 2/4 drop, 05 wheels - SOLD
oops
2007 Victory (Polaris) Hammer 100ci/6spd/stepped pipes/power commander/torque tube intake/lowered
2010 Malibu 3.6vvt
2000 Formula, 6.0, LS3 heads, stall, etc, etc - SOLD
2008 CCSB 4.8 - SOLD
2003 2500HD 6.0, long tubes - SOLD
1999 ECSB 5.3, cam, stall, 2/4 drop, 05 wheels - SOLD
what's wrong with a T56??
'82 C-10......project truck.....
just opinion man, some think its not the most efficient tranny in a truck, but idk theres ways around it. either way a truck can be a bad bitch with either tranny. by efficient i mean it may cost u time if its not a short throw shifter.![]()
It is just me or does that truck have a similar appearance to the bumblebee.
2004 EXC Silverado 6.2L
Mods:
6.2L L92, Ported and Polished stage 3 heads, 95mm Throttle Body, 100mm MAF, NA, Pacesetter LT Headers, Magnaflow X-Pipe Muffler, Electric Fans, 160* thermostat, 2" Drop Shackles, Hellwig Sway Bars Front and Rear, Monroe Reflex Shocks, NGK Spark Plugs, AMW Oil Catch Can, 17"x10" wheels on Kuhmo Tires.
how dare you compare a chevrolet to a dodge.. that's absurd! utterly & obviously senseless, illogical and untrue; contrary to all reason and common sense..
you should be ashamed of yourself. i would be.
jk man. it does have the similiar hood design. that's all i see.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SBTork @ Nov 9 2006, 11:35 PM) [snapback]73047[/snapback]</div>what's wrong with a T56??
[/b]
nothing... jus thte fact that it's a manual.... when we have a 6 speed automatic that beats it WITHOUT a shift kit or stall.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(xlr82sxs @ Nov 10 2006, 04:12 PM) [snapback]73141[/snapback]</div>how dare you compare a chevrolet to a dodge.. that's absurd! utterly & obviously senseless, illogical and untrue; contrary to all reason and common sense..
you should be ashamed of yourself. i would be.
jk man. it does have the similiar hood design. that's all i see.
[/b]
take them to the track and compare them. lol
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Allstar55566 @ Nov 10 2006, 12:35 AM) [snapback]73050[/snapback]</div>just opinion man, some think its not the most efficient tranny in a truck, but idk theres ways around it. either way a truck can be a bad bitch with either tranny. by efficient i mean it may cost u time if its not a short throw shifter.
[/b]
truck, camaro, vette. i'd take a well-set-up automatic any day and twice on sunday. not that i can't drive a manual, i just see no point.
2007 Victory (Polaris) Hammer 100ci/6spd/stepped pipes/power commander/torque tube intake/lowered
2010 Malibu 3.6vvt
2000 Formula, 6.0, LS3 heads, stall, etc, etc - SOLD
2008 CCSB 4.8 - SOLD
2003 2500HD 6.0, long tubes - SOLD
1999 ECSB 5.3, cam, stall, 2/4 drop, 05 wheels - SOLD
Like the saying goes:
Manuals inpress high school kids, automatics win races.
2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!
idk i like both. i love the feeling of grabin gears but, i hate sittin in traffic and pushin the clutch every 10sec.
04 Grand Prix GTP
03 Z71 wanting a Turbo ,Stall, and Tune BAD
THE SURGEON GENERAL SAYS NOTHING ABOUT SMOKIN A FORD