5.3 are really cheap....the 6.0 are expensive....and will everything match up from 4.8 to 6.0....and if im not going to a 5.3 wouldn't a ls1 5.7 be better than a 6.0? maybe not idk
5.3 are really cheap....the 6.0 are expensive....and will everything match up from 4.8 to 6.0....and if im not going to a 5.3 wouldn't a ls1 5.7 be better than a 6.0? maybe not idk
2001 seirra 5.3L ex cab.-- 93 performance Nelson Tune,longtube pacesetter headers, ory, magnaflow with electric cut out, airaid cai, throttle body spacer, clear corners, 1400 watt system, 2 ifinity tens custom boxes, panasonic head unit, punch grill....sold :-(
09 camry se v6....gotta have a gas saver while in college...still gets up and goes tho
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(blackout00 @ Oct 14 2006, 02:49 PM) [snapback]69404[/snapback]</div>Ive read on here that the 6.0 is more boost friendly that is if your looking to boost.5.3 are really cheap....the 6.0 are expensive....and will everything match up from 4.8 to 6.0....and if im not going to a 5.3 wouldn't a ls1 5.7 be better than a 6.0? maybe not idk
[/b]
ls1 is probably more expensive then both engines. You may pay 500 or so more for a low mile 6.0, but you can get that much more out of the 6.0 then the 5.3. No doubt the 5.3 is strong, but if your going to take the time to do the swap go big or go home i guess is the saying.
1951 3100
1984 C10
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote