+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: 243 LS heads - fully assembled

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by o2camaross View Post
    But guys, true 6.0 243's on a "cupped" piston 5.3 would be approximately 12.687 CR, but if they came off a 5.7 and were put on a 4.8 with "domes" it would have 7.569 CR. Bump for a stinky okie. Btw, I wish I could afford them lol, but Im broke as always
    you seriously cant be serious with that math
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ponca City
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by MrHorsepowerLSx View Post
    Larger combustion chambers will lower compression if the heads they are replacing had smaller chambers, example an 06 lq9 and an 06 ls2 use the same pistons, the lq9 uses a 71cc chamber and the ls2 uses a 64.5cc ( even tho GM displays it at 64cc ) the lq9 registers a Compression Ratio of 10.1:1, the ls2 with its smaller combustion chamber with the SAME piston it will yield an 11:1 compression ratio. This example was given based off of identical bore x stroke combos based off of a 4" inch bore using identical pistons..... Hope this helps bump
    Was a joke... Lol
    Slowest in Oklahoma...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    Quote Originally Posted by MrHorsepowerLSx View Post
    Larger combustion chambers will lower compression if the heads they are replacing had smaller chambers, example an 06 lq9 and an 06 ls2 use the same pistons, the lq9 uses a 71cc chamber and the ls2 uses a 64.5cc ( even tho GM displays it at 64cc ) the lq9 registers a Compression Ratio of 10.1:1, the ls2 with its smaller combustion chamber with the SAME piston it will yield an 11:1 compression ratio. This example was given based off of identical bore x stroke combos based off of a 4" inch bore using identical pistons..... Hope this helps bump
    Thanks!!!! Least somebody knows wats going on

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    Quote Originally Posted by bootlife View Post
    Thanks!!!! Least somebody knows wats going on
    I think you are trying to argue something completely different. All stock 243s are the same no matter what motor they come from minus the valve thing. Different motors will net different cr according to a lot of factors that have little to do with the heads and everything to do with pistons, stroke, etc. Not all 5.3s are created equally, but all 243s basically are.
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    Quote Originally Posted by bootlife View Post
    Thanks!!!! Least somebody knows wats going on
    Let me go ahead and reiterate something I've said about you multiple times... you're literally the dumbest guy on this forum at this point. Please, do us all a favor and don't speak.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Honeywood, Ontario
    Posts
    6,994
    Quote Originally Posted by bootlife View Post
    6.0, 5.3, 5.7 have diff combustion chamber sizes. If u put 6.0 heads on a 5.3 u will loose compression
    Not if they're all the same casting number. 799/243's are the same no matter what engine they come off of. 5.3, 5.7, 6.0 have all used 243/799 heads at some point, and they're all the same.
    2006 Silverado
    Little Black Bitch

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    605
    Quote Originally Posted by ecld_07 View Post
    Are you sure. Surely a larger cumbustion chamber wouldn't drop compression..... Bump for a good seller and thread crappers
    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Not if they're all the same casting number. 799/243's are the same no matter what engine they come off of. 5.3, 5.7, 6.0 have all used 243/799 heads at some point, and they're all the same.
    Thanks guys...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    5,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchy View Post
    Not if they're all the same casting number. 799/243's are the same no matter what engine they come off of. 5.3, 5.7, 6.0 have all used 243/799 heads at some point, and they're all the same.
    Like I said above the only difference would be if they came off a true LS2 from the car....then they would have the sodium filled valves. But other than that they are the exact same heads that come on the 4.8,5.3,and the 6.0 in all GM's cars and trucks.
    T-RAV
    99 GMC | 5.3 | Skinny White Guy Tuned

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    The LS6 heads are the ones that had sodium longer valves
    The LS2 heads had the same springs as the LS6 heads did but normal valves
    5.3 HO motors had 243 or 799
    53 trailblazers had 243
    GenIV 4.8 and 5.3s have 243/799

    all these heads have same chambers

    difference was the pistons over the yrs for different models
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anacoco, La
    Posts
    433
    There is a diff in combustion chamber size. If they were the same a 6.0 head that's running 9.1 compression would be way lower if u put it on a 4.8, that's y they say to mill the heads to up comp. if the heads were all the same based on casting numbers 6.0s would run cupped shaped pistons, and 4.8 would need domes to make up the diff in comp because of bore size. 5.7 heads on a 6.0 will give u a bump in compression. There chambers are set up for a smaller piston than the 6.0s. Call trick flow n ask bout a set of heads that are 9.1:1 compression, and they will ask wat ur putting them on. Combustion chamber and pistion, size and type play big rolls in compression. So lol what motor did ur heads come off of?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts