+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Wait4meperformance

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    DFW, TEXAS
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by kerrige View Post
    29mpg? In a car? I can't imagine that would be possible even in the most efficiente truck builds. Maybe in a V6 5speed.
    I never got anywhere near 20mpg when i had the 4.3 in it. hell my 02 s10 4.3 5 speed was maybe 22 downhill with a tail wind. I dont whats in the tap water these days. maybe its just me

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Colorado springs
    Posts
    115
    Haha, look, it did it, I don't know how. But it did. and I wish I could do it again. And I had the 6.0 in it now that I think about it. plus I babied the hell out of it. not speeding, no burnouts, just really easy. Those were good days haha I had a 4.3 once and it too wasn't that good. Probably because of how hard the engine had to work compared to the 6.0.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bandera, TX
    Posts
    2,921
    Manual Trans is much more efficient. And a 4.8 or 5.3 will usually always out do a 4.3 in mileage bc the 4.3 is old crap technology. When I had my manual in my truck @ 600+ rwhp on a 6.0/gtk850 single fmt I got 18-20 when cruising it regularly, so I could see high 20s out of a 4.8 easy. It just sux bc the manual wasn't near a fast as the auto.
    single digit street truck


    for build info

    http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...cs-garage.html

    The best advice I have ever heard:... Only take B( . Y . )ST advice from someone that is CURRENTLY running a turbo setup close to, or bigger than what you want......

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Honeywood, Ontario
    Posts
    6,994
    That's the only benefit to the 5speed.
    2006 Silverado
    Little Black Bitch

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    11,038
    Quote Originally Posted by kerrige View Post
    29mpg?... Maybe in a V6 5speed.
    not even in that, the v6 gets just as much or worse than a v8, i know it's stupid, hahaha..

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Honeywood, Ontario
    Posts
    6,994
    My 4.3 AVERAGED 21. My 5.3 averages 24, never seen it go below 20. The V6 was tuned only. The V8 is a heads/cam combo. All other variables are the same.
    2006 Silverado
    Little Black Bitch

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    mansfield texas
    Posts
    3,512
    Quote Originally Posted by blacstar View Post
    I never got anywhere near 20mpg when i had the 4.3 in it. hell my 02 s10 4.3 5 speed was maybe 22 downhill with a tail wind. I dont whats in the tap water these days. maybe its just me
    Ive only ever had mid twenties on in a rcsb 5.3 and ive had a few. Like 4 yrs ago i had a bullydog uner on it and in eco mode goin to sar i got 27+

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    5.3 is the best in mpg out of the Ls engines
    I have had all 4.3-6.2 lol

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    mansfield texas
    Posts
    3,512
    Quote Originally Posted by CHEVROLADE View Post
    5.3 is the best in mpg out of the Ls engines
    I have had all 4.3-6.2 lol
    Plus 1!

    Effin saab/tbss has the effin worse. I got 9 if lucky. Glad i was only driving mile and half each day to get brandon

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Idabel, OK
    Posts
    204
    69chvelle and another mutal friend not on here, both run wait4me tunes and are pleased with them. Both their cars are cammed and one also has heads. Great bang for the buck, his tune's are about the cheapest out there.
    99 C5 cam/boltons 400rwhp
    10 Sierra CC 6.2
    03 Suburban 5.3

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts