it was a good article just got it in the last one. I have to say for what it is the Ferd is pretty bad ass. A mid travel 4x4 with a S/C'd 6.2 would be fun.
it was a good article just got it in the last one. I have to say for what it is the Ferd is pretty bad ass. A mid travel 4x4 with a S/C'd 6.2 would be fun.
Name: Mark,
God created turbo lag so nitrous trucks could have a chance.
http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post274877
I think if the GM was tuned with HPT or EFI live it would have been much closer.
1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4
should of put a turbo on the gm instead lol....i bet you the chevy/gmc still runs faster
I think I saw something that said the SC units are very limited on the 6.2 due to the valve train dod/vvt crap.
ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06
waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam
This...they wake up the Fords really well but not the GMs.Originally Posted by kerrige
2005 Silverado SS AWD
AEM CAI, ARH LTs, HD-2 shift kit with vette servo, Circle D 278mm 3200 stall Madtunesracing.com street tune (MTR now has a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno)
13.82 @ 94.92 w/1.83 60'
we need a captain obvious sign.
THEY CALL ME G.
AZRAEL
2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
2023 300S 5.7
2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]
The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
