very nice car seen it in person many time around town
very nice car seen it in person many time around town
2012 Ford F-150 Ecoboost Super Crew 4x4, stock and staying that way.
2001 chevy green = LS1 stock, 3k stall, 373 posi, tuned by LSX Power in CS TX
yea i dont believe that calculator much, some of the numbers punched in work others not so well. Local guy who runs the LSX series this year traps 129 on a 100 shot on a LQ4 with a polluter,stock 243 heads, GMT900, 1 3/4 headers, 80e,513 gears in 3600lb raceweight elcamino. says combo is 600 rwhp which isnt possible
its odd how one vehicle can trap that mph at that power level and others with less power trap the same or visa versa
whats those vehicles dyno on a mustang?
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Wow quik your kinda hating on the dynapak numbers lately.... You have some sick rides yourself and for the most part I like you respect you and what you have to say but dang man lately seems like you really seem to b downing those ppl testing on dynapakks
ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06
waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam
numbers dont match...when local cars are going faster or same speed with less power and little more weight...whats that tell you? not a fan of a dyno that you remove you wheels as they always seem to give false numbers
Jon is a good dude but his posting of a dynapak were bashed instantly for being off, not just this site or PT.net but other sites. if you view other sites they frown on dynapaks. Most use the mustang as general.
700rwhp in a Fbody usually nets you 140 trap speeds, near 600 nets you mid 130s
2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
412 Motorsports
it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference
Heres more videos of the same car a few years ago on a different setup. Dyno was done on a dynojet. It made 624rwhp and trapped 129mph. This also matches what the calculators say. The calculators are based of physics, its takes xxxhp to run xxxmph in a 1/4mile.
http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/5/VbmkC4PNoFw
http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/1/8VQkrPZaeLQ
Both of these dynos match exactly what the math does.. plain and simple..
None of those vids showed any kind of ''actual'' dyno data. Unless they yelled it during the video, cause i can't use sound at work. But even then they could shout any number they wanted. So where are those numbers from? Just asking.
2013 CC 5.3
81 C10 LS1 project