+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: 383LT1 Formula Dynapak

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park
    Posts
    898
    very nice car seen it in person many time around town
    2012 Ford F-150 Ecoboost Super Crew 4x4, stock and staying that way.
    2001 chevy green = LS1 stock, 3k stall, 373 posi, tuned by LSX Power in CS TX

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    yea i dont believe that calculator much, some of the numbers punched in work others not so well. Local guy who runs the LSX series this year traps 129 on a 100 shot on a LQ4 with a polluter,stock 243 heads, GMT900, 1 3/4 headers, 80e,513 gears in 3600lb raceweight elcamino. says combo is 600 rwhp which isnt possible


    its odd how one vehicle can trap that mph at that power level and others with less power trap the same or visa versa

    whats those vehicles dyno on a mustang?
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Arizona/Utah
    Posts
    3,939
    Wow quik your kinda hating on the dynapak numbers lately.... You have some sick rides yourself and for the most part I like you respect you and what you have to say but dang man lately seems like you really seem to b downing those ppl testing on dynapakks
    ECSB 2kSierra 2wd 4.8L-K&N-HPtuners-Calspeed LT's-Magnaflow-Tahoe20's-HankookRH06

    waiting to go in... 3.90s, 214/220cam

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    numbers dont match...when local cars are going faster or same speed with less power and little more weight...whats that tell you? not a fan of a dyno that you remove you wheels as they always seem to give false numbers
    Jon is a good dude but his posting of a dynapak were bashed instantly for being off, not just this site or PT.net but other sites. if you view other sites they frown on dynapaks. Most use the mustang as general.

    700rwhp in a Fbody usually nets you 140 trap speeds, near 600 nets you mid 130s
    Quote Originally Posted by kerrige View Post
    Wow quik your kinda hating on the dynapak numbers lately.... You have some sick rides yourself and for the most part I like you respect you and what you have to say but dang man lately seems like you really seem to b downing those ppl testing on dynapakks
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Round Rock, TX
    Posts
    3,069
    Heres more videos of the same car a few years ago on a different setup. Dyno was done on a dynojet. It made 624rwhp and trapped 129mph. This also matches what the calculators say. The calculators are based of physics, its takes xxxhp to run xxxmph in a 1/4mile.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/5/VbmkC4PNoFw

    http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/1/8VQkrPZaeLQ

    Both of these dynos match exactly what the math does.. plain and simple..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Trussville, AL
    Posts
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by DBRODS View Post
    Heres more videos of the same car a few years ago on a different setup. Dyno was done on a dynojet. It made 624rwhp and trapped 129mph. This also matches what the calculators say. The calculators are based of physics, its takes xxxhp to run xxxmph in a 1/4mile.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/5/VbmkC4PNoFw

    http://www.youtube.com/user/tx20d#p/u/1/8VQkrPZaeLQ

    Both of these dynos match exactly what the math does.. plain and simple..
    there is a little more to it than that...
    its just a turbo 5.3 that a couple of kids threw together

    01 silverado

    09 cobalt ss

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Racoon Twp., PA
    Posts
    1,572
    None of those vids showed any kind of ''actual'' dyno data. Unless they yelled it during the video, cause i can't use sound at work. But even then they could shout any number they wanted. So where are those numbers from? Just asking.
    2013 CC 5.3
    81 C10 LS1 project

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts