+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: F.a.s.t102 intake

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    2,348
    Quote Originally Posted by STUNNA View Post
    damm lol lots of $$$....u think them fuel rails on that pic above would work on my truck?what rails did u use?thanks to some info i got,nick williams offeres the electronic 102mm tbs for about 580.00
    i run the nasty performance fuel rails i think, you would be fine with a stock vette or camaro rail
    74 Austin Morris Mini 1000 - Daily Coil Spring conversion, lowered, Disc Brake conversion
    FOR SALE: 04 RC/LB Duramax -12 second tow pig, built Allison, Tune, and supporting mods
    FOR SALE: 03 Silverado SS -DBRods built 40X, DP, Suspension. Going for fast

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Scott, Arkansas
    Posts
    424
    Was that a 102 car intake? I saw a test on of the 102 truck intake on a Vmax at PT.net and it gained 19hp peak and lost nothing anywhere in the curve and that was with the stock TB.

    Nevermind I clicked the link. Yeah the LS3/LS7 intakes are not blowing anyone away. That tells me GM actually did a good job with these intakes. Now the 102 stuff on a cathedral motor is still doing well.
    2005 Silverado SS AWD
    AEM CAI, ARH LTs, HD-2 shift kit with vette servo, Circle D 278mm 3200 stall Madtunesracing.com street tune (MTR now has a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno)

    13.82 @ 94.92 w/1.83 60'

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gramercy
    Posts
    945
    if you are not going 408+ i wouldnt worry with that intake imo. UNLESS you plan on a huge ass turbo/Procharger set up.
    2008 GMC CCSB 6.2/6L80e swap
    Gen IV 5.3/60e swap 1994 ecsb W/T

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts