Closed Thread
Page 9 of 31 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 19 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 309

Thread: Why not more 454's?

  1. #81
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Plainfield, IL
    Posts
    2,036
    ya lambo...get a big block...send me your 862s lol
    blown transmissions are about as useful as 97% of the guys on this forum

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Rio Grande City TX.
    Posts
    220
    well i went with the 454 C.I. reason been I like N/A power and big cubes means more power
    2004 Silverado:THELSX L.M.E LSX 454 C.I tuned by Llavero 11.1 N/A @121 MPH
    2004 Sierra:GUNSLINGER L.M.E LSX 427C.I,Twin Borg Warner/Forced Induction 76mm, th400, Ford 9" with ladder bar

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    1,812
    Cube for cube, with the same bore and stroke per motor, Im pretty sure the LS would lay down more power. Even the L92 heads straight from the factory already flow as much as most old school big block heads. Both are great motors, but a bbc is just too heavy imo

    lol on whoever said Canafail btw

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Sallisaw OK
    Posts
    2,194
    Quote Originally Posted by ss wrecker View Post
    obviously youve never heard of an erl ls block i have an aquaintance with a 500ci ls in a zo6 here in dallas.
    Thats what i was thinking about when i read this thread.
    GM LS Superdeck II Short Blocks

    I would love something like that, 500 ci
    But really the 408 in my truck breaks the 38" rear tires loose like nothing so i dont need more power lol, i especially dont need to spend more money.
    1996 gmc ext cab short bed
    6.6L 4l80e
    MY GARAGE

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ft. Misery, FL
    Posts
    12
    I see you guys are still feeding the trolls...
    The wires, the wires, they are every where!1!1 lsx/2dr fullsize blazer conversion, in progress

  6. #86
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    373
    another point to bring up is, i dunno about where u guys live but if i wanted to take my 07 truck and throw in a BB with a carb i would not be able to get it licensed or pass smog. So for most people on here we'd run LS motors because its new technology to go with our newer trucks. Plus an LS motors weighs less then a BB, just sayin.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by truckinL33 View Post
    Not to add fuel to the fire, but BBC's are limited RPM wise unless you put a ton of money into them. LSx engines car whine up just as good as anyone's wife.
    A performance BBC will rev ever bit as high as an LS motor. I have a 454 BBC with stock high perf GM internals that I take to 7,200 rpm regularly. The old 427 big blocks had no problem reving to near 8,000 with a good valve train and stock high performance GM parts.


    Quote Originally Posted by bangbangskeetskeet View Post
    You sure about that? The LSx goes to 512 cubes. Like i said you gotta have all your cubes to come close to the LS motors. Im not so sure you seeing the point were all making.

    CUBE FOR CUBE LS MOTORS OWN ALL

    Maybe that will make it easier to read/understand????
    Spoken like a true ricer. You clearly have a lot to learn. As a motor gets bigger you have diminishing returns. Doesn't matter what motor it is. That's why cube for cube an import motor makes more power than a LS motor. And that's why cube for cube a motorcycle motor makes more power than an import car motor. That's why a model airplane motor makes far more power per cube than a motorcycle motor. Are you getting the big picture yet?

    Now, as for the comparison between a 500ci BBC and a 500ci LSX. The BBC would win because the LSX motor would be pushing the limits of how many cubes you can stuff in a block that size. The 500ci LS motor is a cobbled together abomination using a deck plate and a bad bore/stroke combo (small bore big stroke). Good if you're building a tractor, if you want to go fast, not so much. The LSX probably has problems with rod angularity and side loading on the pistons, where a tall deck BBC can go much bigger than 500ci and would be cranking out power easier and would be using a one piece aluminum block. Not to mention the BBC could be cheaper to build using off the shelf parts and may even be lighter than the 500ci LS motor. My aluminum 572 weighs less than a cast iron SBC.

    What can a 500ci big block do? One has to look no farther than NHRA Pro Stock to find out. Six second quarter miles (current record is 6.509) with 500ci (500ci max NHRA Pro Stock rules) with no power adder. You won't find a LS motor running NHRA Pro Stock because it wouldn't qualify for the field (far too slow). Maxed out, a 500ci LS motor can't even come close!

    Even twin turbo LS motors can't run the naturally aspirated NHRA Pro Stock times.



    Quote Originally Posted by oleshifty View Post
    a) the blue font is really making people angry around here

    b) that's a nice bbc you have...but i guarantee you have some $$$$ in it. Hell, that oil pan alone was probably 500 bucks.

    c) cousin has about 5 grand into his 81 malibu....502, 2 stage nitrous, forged, bla bla bla. Runs LOW 8 on juice, mid 10 n/a. For 5 grand, very few people here would be running 10's, and definately not n/a. HOWEVER, his car overheats nonstop, and gets about 3mpg.

    I would guess some of the faster guys here are STILL getting 15mpg+, and drive their car atleast on a semi-regular basis. They don't have to readjust the carb everytime the weather changes, and don't have to worry about a bowl running dry if they floor it.


    Each has its advantages, if I was making a pure drag car, I'd probably lean towards the BBC, but for a daily driver, ls motor is the way to go.
    Sounds like your cousin needs a bigger radiator and/or better cooling fans. Or maybe he doesn't care because he never intends to drive it very far.

    Actually when you start running quick a carb takes far less tinkering than EFI does. A carb is just as quick and it's cheaper.

    I agree, for a daily driver it's hard to beat the newer cars performance and mileage. But when you want to get serious about going fast, it's much more cost effective to move on to a big block and a carb.


    Quote Originally Posted by truckinL33 View Post
    There's a reason why the LSx has been dubed "motor from god".
    I guess that makes the BBC god. lol LS motors are great little motors, but when you want to get really serious the LS takes a back seat to the big block.

    Quote Originally Posted by TurboMic View Post
    it will never happen, he is a talker... just like most bench racers.... all about what it COULD do... and never anything on what it WILL do...
    You're right. These internet races never happen. That's why you're talking like a big shot when you'd have no chance of winning.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mang213 View Post
    Cube for cube, with the same bore and stroke per motor, Im pretty sure the LS would lay down more power. Even the L92 heads straight from the factory already flow as much as most old school big block heads. Both are great motors, but a bbc is just too heavy imo
    See above.

    Quote Originally Posted by GRsilverado View Post
    another point to bring up is, i dunno about where u guys live but if i wanted to take my 07 truck and throw in a BB with a carb i would not be able to get it licensed or pass smog. So for most people on here we'd run LS motors because its new technology to go with our newer trucks. Plus an LS motors weighs less then a BB, just sayin.
    You folks in the republic of Kalifornia can't do anything because big brother always has you under his thumb. lol j/k



    This is my last post on this message board. Too many closed minded people here. So have at it, rake me over the coals (even though I have two LS vehicles) and march on blinded by the light of the LS truck.

  8. #88
    This thread just turned from entertaining to a total waste of time. Some one bring it back into the amusing side please.
    99RCSB Broke because I wasted thousands and thousands of dollars on my truck.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Fasglas View Post
    This is my last post on this message board. Too many closed minded people here. So have at it, rake me over the coals (even though I have two LS vehicles) and march on blinded by the light of the LS truck.

    Welcome to the interwebz yo. Thats how so many forums are. You deal with it and slowly try to make people understand, or you don't.
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wichita Falls, TX
    Posts
    2,172
    I will agree that there is a lot of closed-mindedness in this place. I will also agree that big block is the way. How many pros do you see using LS motors.
    Last edited by lo-lyf; 06-03-2010 at 03:08 PM.
    2005 black Yukon XL SLT - traded in for me wife's new Fusion (GM sucks these days)
    2002 black Yukon SLT (the skinny sister)
    1969 green Pontiac GTO (Layla, AKA the black sheep)

    INSTALLS AND MORE.. http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...-low-life.html
    Sticky/broken gauges? I can help. PM me for details.

Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts