+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Shorties Vs Long Tubes?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    I have Edelbrock Ceramic Coated Shorties on my truck and have always wanted long tubes, but didn't want to pay the price. I recently saw a post that stated that shorties only give you 3-6HP and long tubes will give you 20-25? Does this sound accurate? If it is true I wouldn't mind selling my shorties and going with Long Tubes.
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    1,353
    I think the big difference being that LT's offer a much bigger torque increase.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado, HPTuners, all stock.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    is there really a 20hp difference?
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    modesto, ca
    Posts
    173
    A 20hp gain just seems a bit much to me. I would say 10hp is more realistic. Long tube headers are known for there mid range torque increase, I still think the clamed torque increase is over rated as well. I have a rule, When there is a clamed power increase I will cut it in half and that usually make it more realistic to the buttometer.
    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...dited-copy.jpg
    2007 Sierra crew 5.3 4wd, stock for now
    2004 Sierra scsb 5.3 - sold
    02 Z28 SLP cold air pack, Corsa exh, Center Force dual friction + 23 lb flywheel
    66 Chevy C20 (collecting dust)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    Well it seems enough to me. I'm selling mine to a buddy for $200 and buying long tube ceramic coated pacesetters. What do ya think?
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    997
    Post the price and where ya gettin' it from, please. I'm looking for similar item. I'm putting a 5.3 in my old '86 C10.
    Test-n-Tune (Nov 23, 2008) - 13.65s @ 98mph

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    I bought them from speed engineering, who sponsors the website. Got them for $350 + S&H.
    About $400 sent to me.
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Galesburg Il
    Posts
    87
    I put Edelbrock shorties on my truck because I've yet to see any real facts showing that the long tubes actually produce better hp or torque. I thought maybe this thread would produce such evidence but alas, not this time.... again. I think lots of us get the long tubes because they are perceived as being sexy, cool. Prove me wrong.
    2002 white Silverado ext cab. Taillights filled, roll pan w/93 Cad lights horizontally placed, tailgate handle inside, Gaylord tonneau, bed slide & bed rug, all trim removed, Escalade door handles, 18" Enkei & Falcons, Speed grill. Grill shell, bumper pad, & valance painted white. Mirrors painted white. Many interior pcs painted black (over beige), black leather seat inserts and sun visors. 2" dropped DJM lower control arm, shackles/hangers for 4" rear drop. Engine: 5.3 , Radix w 2.8" pulley, 90 mm throttle body, Dart 225 heads, Comp Cam 581-588 224-230 on 114. ARP head bolts. KTech rod bolts. Alky Control methanol injection, Pacesetter lt's into elec cutouts then 4" polished Magnaflow SS mufflers then 4" ovalized SS pipes exiting in front of rear wheels both sides, gas tank removed and 24 gal. fuel cell where spare tire was w/Aeromotive pump, pre and post filters and pump controller & -10 SS fuel line. 160 thermostat MSD wires & Perma Cool fan, 34" radiator, Meziere elec water pump. Valve covers, alternator & brackets powdercoated white. Built 4l60e, 4.56 with Detroit Locker Trutrack. 2 Interceptor logging guages, FAST dual 02 sensor wb gauge, Cyberdyne vac/boost gauge. Truck is actually the property of a little Benji type dog. Pics of him and the truck too www.swardphotos.shutterfly.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,053
    There are plenty of dyno charts showing 22hp gains from the pacesetters I have dynatechs on mine and they made a nice improvement. Jim take a look at your shorties then stock manifolds then lts you will see the difference and I promise you get some lts you will feel the difference no comparison. The only time I would think about shorties is if I had a radix where it will help with torque but even then I would rather have the hp gain from the lts since a radix makes such nice torque down low anyway.
    2007 CCSB Z71 VortecMax: Stock!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462
    Originally posted by JimS@Nov 23 2005, 09:14 PM
    I put Edelbrock shorties on my truck because I've yet to see any real facts showing that the long tubes actually produce better hp or torque. I thought maybe this thread would produce such evidence but alas, not this time.... again. I think lots of us get the long tubes because they are perceived as being sexy, cool. Prove me wrong.
    They don't make any noticable power at all. I had a set of JBAs I threw on ebay... there's not even an increase in sound.

    Also, I ran shorty headers on my F150 before going to LTs... while the shorty headers helped a BIT the stock manifolds are bricks on that truck. When the LTs went on there was a noticable increase in low speed as well as midrange torque.

    Do what you want but when EVERYONE tells you NOT to do a mod, that's a pretty good sign that it isn't worth a damn...
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts