oh im at 10:1 compression and 3.73 gears
oh im at 10:1 compression and 3.73 gears
5.3L, LS6 intake, shaved 862s, 10:1 CR, 3.73 gears... I'd go with a 226/228 .563/.569 112 LSA +3. Then get a 3000+ stall and you'll be good!
2000 ECSB 6.0L
TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's
That cam sounds a little big I was thinking of the tr220 but what difference am i gonna notice between a 114 and 116 lsa iknow the idle will be a little better with the 116 but what power differences are there
Compression drops with a tighter cam.Originally Posted by slinds
GET OUT OF HERE WITH THAT RICER MATH!
What Tyler said.. 224 or bigger but i would go with a 3400 or 3600 stall...
114, a little choppier idle than the 116. The 116 will be almost stockish. The 116 will allow the power to come in a little earlier than the 114.
Still, go 224. Seriously. You don't wanna be the guy who goes with a cam then wishes he went bigger.
2000 ECSB 6.0L
TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's
No - it's the opposite. A narrower LSA will have an earlier intake valve closing event, which is the same as advancing the cam. The 112 LSA allow the power to come in a little earlier, it will have a peakier power curve, and the power will fall off a little earlier than a 114 LSA. But the 112 LSA may make a little more peak power due to the increased overlap.
Yeah, yeah. I have been doing that a lot lately. I am thinking one thing and typing the other. Like when I was talking about Ian's rocker problem. I was wanting to talk about the cylinders at the back of the motor (#7 and #8 obviously), but I said #4 and #8.
2000 ECSB 6.0L
TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's
Yeah I'd get something with a 114LSA if you don't like the lopey idle! TR220 would be a good cam.
2000 Chevy Silverado RCSB LS6 5 speed, LS6 short block, 317 heads, LS6 intake, Lunati 220/224 .575/.575 112LSA cam, Edelbrock Headers, CTS-V accessory drive, Nelson Performance Custom Tune.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
