The only requirement for our engines is that the oil must meet GM 6094M standards. It was in my manuel![]()
The only requirement for our engines is that the oil must meet GM 6094M standards. It was in my manuel![]()
cjriojas:if you're weather man is a 5 gallon bucket, YOUUUUUUUUUUU might be a redneck
danger_ranger83: I see now why it cost so much to get a harness made... FML
2boostedSilverado: I like Casey's rear end, I want to chat with him about it
Mobil 1 FTW. 5W-30 here.
IMO--pretty ballsy to switch at that mileage. I can't tell you how many times motors have gone by the way-side just because of switching oil types. Unless you flush the motor and install a new oil pump, I would be weary on switch oil types at that mileage. But you are one of the lucky ones.
Christain has a thing for "Manuels" apparently.
But the best thing is that TRAVIS was the one who caught the spelling mistake. Yes folks--Travis.![]()
2000 ECSB 6.0L
TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's
did it on our tahoe at about same time (02 5.3) ...and every other car i've ever owned. There's not THAT much difference. Synthetic has a lot of myths involved. Besides it not sludging, and not breaking down as easy...it's the same stuff. I'd trust synthetic in high mileage motor over conventional.
blown transmissions are about as useful as 97% of the guys on this forum