+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Maggies??

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Jose CA.
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Felix Arrizon View Post
    MagnaCharger 2004-06 Radix Intercooled 122 Kit
    vs
    MagnaCharger 2004-06 Radix Intercooled 4.8/5.3/6.0L
    Whats the difference between them?? I guess the 122 is better cause is more expensive..
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightRider View Post
    ok there is a mp-112 max boost is 8-9 psi

    mp-122hh could see 12-14 psi
    the 122 has a 4 blade rotor and is a better blower but you cant max it out on a stock bottom end

    they are both intercooled
    They both are 3 lobe compressors I believe. Difference is displacement, the amount of air pumped. The 112 is not maxed out at 8-9lbs but rather it's efficiency is a certain rpm of the blower. I make an easy 10lbs with a 3" snout pulley.

    The bolt on kit is complete and will start you out with ~5lbs boost. No other mods are needed.
    626/762 2005 SIERRA 11.34@119.81
    My other ride is a '91 Electraglide custom.

  2. #12
    MidnightRider Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by trever1t View Post
    They both are 3 lobe compressors I believe. Difference is displacement, the amount of air pumped. The 112 is not maxed out at 8-9lbs but rather it's efficiency is a certain rpm of the blower. I make an easy 10lbs with a 3" snout pulley.

    The bolt on kit is complete and will start you out with ~5lbs boost. No other mods are needed.
    wow i know you from pt.net im rather shocked that you dont know better

    on our stock trucks the best he will see out of a 112 is 8-9 i have one i know

    and the 122only comes in high helix and is a 4 lobe compressor. please do more research so you dont confuse this guy and kill my sell

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Jose CA.
    Posts
    177
    if i am wrong I will chock it up to old age but I am pretty sure the TVS (Gen VI) is 4 lobe and the gen V (112/122) is only 3 lobe but I will check with Magnuson in the morning for ya.
    626/762 2005 SIERRA 11.34@119.81
    My other ride is a '91 Electraglide custom.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Jose CA.
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightRider View Post
    wow i know you from pt.net im rather shocked that you dont know better

    on our stock trucks the best he will see out of a 112 is 8-9 i have one i know

    and the 122only comes in high helix and is a 4 lobe compressor. please do more research so you dont confuse this guy and kill my sell

    Maybe you should do some research of your own by the way let me reiterate I am making 10+lbs with a 3" pulley. I lost boost freeing up the exhaust with headers.

    Quote Originally Posted by whitt1
    Is the the MP122HH the same as a R2300?
    negative, the MP122HH is considered an evolution of the 5th gen if I'm not mistaken, a high helix 3 lobe setup displacing 2.0L. The R1900 1.9L is of the newest designs (6 gen I believe), 4 lobe, even higher helix
    Green Car Congress: Eaton Introduces Next-Generation Supercharger
    626/762 2005 SIERRA 11.34@119.81
    My other ride is a '91 Electraglide custom.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    648
    WTF? Im confused...
    06' Silverado RCSB 5.3L 4wd..
    PERFORMANCE: Cam, Springs, Pushrods, P&P heads & 3 angle valve job, Injectors, PS LT's & ORY, Nelson Tune, Catback, CAI, Comp Cam Double Timing Chain, HP Oil Pump, UD Pullies, ARP bolts, Stall, TBS, 4.10's, Iridium NGK's, G-80, 160 t-stat, HD-2 & Vette Servo, 46,000 tranny cooler, 75-125hp shot of funny Gas..
    HID's Hi, Lows & Fogs
    Waiting to be installed: LC-1 WB & Standalone system

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Jose CA.
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Felix Arrizon View Post
    WTF? Im confused...
    about the lobes? A supercharger is nothing more than an air compressor, shoving air into your manifold/cylinders. A 112 compressor is good for an engine up to and including 6.0, anything larger should go with the 122 or a Gen VI TVS unit of which there are 2, the 1900 and 2300.
    I have a 112 and do just fine with it, probably pushing it just past it's peak efficiency range but it works to push my 5300lb truck into the mid 11's.
    626/762 2005 SIERRA 11.34@119.81
    My other ride is a '91 Electraglide custom.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    89
    If anything he is helping your sell. Why buy a 122 for more money when he can buy your 112 (polished) and get pretty much the same boost out of it. I was personally involved in taking a 112 off and putting a 122 on and that truck (6.0L) didn't gain any boost. Yeah yeah, he changed cams, but unless you can get a 122 for the same price or cheaper...I'd just do a 112. You can almost get a better deal on a 112. Just my 4cents. (inflation and trying to cover my losses in the market)
    2K Silverado 4WD/6.0/80E/TVS1900/Juiced at the track
    Tuned by the Seat of My Pants
    12.22 @ 110.75 blower/meth/110 (76*) (radix)
    12.130 @ 109.95 blower (45*) (TVS1900)
    11.66 @ 115.95 bower/meth/110/50shot (45*) (radix)
    11.35 @ 117.35 blower/meth/110/75shot (45*) (radix)

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    2,120
    Trever1t is correct, they are both high helix but the MP122 is 3 lobe 60 degree and the TVS is 4 lobe. They didn't go 4 lobe until the TVS.


    97 GMC, 2002 LS6.

    1991 GMC Syclone #1428

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    9,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Felix Arrizon View Post
    how much power do you think I will be getting out of that setup that you just mentioned?
    Well, like it is mentioned below, with the supporting mods, you can achieve over 500+ hp. But you will need a smaller pulley, a meth kit, cam, valvetrain, properly sized injectors, etc. It isn't a horrible idea if you had your stock heads cleaned up and had a 5-angle valve job done. When you spec your cam, make sure it is slightly intake biased--(for a 5.3L) something like a 220/218 .581/.563 115 LSA. I am by no means a cam spec pro, but something in that range is what I would spec for my own truck.

    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightRider View Post
    its fully capable of 500+ rwhp if donr properly tyler and danny were there for my install and have been a huge help with getting the blower right i have spared no expense and have a fast reliable setup i also get 20-22 mpg out of boost highway
    Yeah, Jason's truck is very reliable and with his 3.42 gears, he does get decent mpgs on the highway...

    2000 ECSB 6.0L
    TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts