+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Whats easier?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    147
    I think the LSX engines are impressive either carb'd or fi.
    I have a 5.3 in an obs, and stayed with the fi, as I figured all the technology and tuning would be going in that direction.
    The software, though challenging to learn, gives you nearly infinite options for tuning which is very fun.

    That said, the carb is definitely not dead, and some carb'd lsx engines are making big power.

    My vote would be stick with the injection. FWIW
    '92 Fullsize, swb rc
    5.3L/T56 conversion, comp XR275 HR cam .566/.568 lift 222/224 duration 112 lsa, crane dual springs, trick flow push rods, K&N Filter, Nelson Performance tune, Keisler shifter relocation kit, Boyd Coddington Smoothie II 18x8 235/55 up front, 18x10 295/45 out back, 2/4 drop, eaton lsd w/4.56 gears

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    Quote Originally Posted by ChevyLee View Post
    but how is the mpg?
    what the hell is mpg?
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by duckysbht View Post
    what the hell is mpg?
    Yeah what is this MPG you speak of?
    http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm122/JMinor00/chevy-1.jpg
    White 1992 C1500 RIP, lost to fire
    Orange 1997 C1500 Autocross truck

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Chevlowrider View Post
    Yeah what is this MPG you speak of?
    Sounds foreign to me..
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SE Georgia
    Posts
    417
    Tired ol' 5.7, 5.3 swap in progress
    Handle every stressful situation like a dog.
    If you can't eat it or hump it.
    Piss on it and walk away.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Austin Tx.
    Posts
    13,138
    hmm thats new to me
    1951 3100
    1984 C10

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    S.A. Texas
    Posts
    3,751
    mpg's we don't need your stinking mpgs
    Name: Mark,
    God created turbo lag so nitrous trucks could have a chance.


    http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post274877

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    997
    Cam'd 5.3L (w/ some other SLIGHT mods).... mpg = 18 (hwy)

    My motor's fuel injected. Thought about carb'd, but didn't like the idea of cold-starting during winter months. Someone on this board did a carb'd setup in a mid-80s truck. Don't recall any major downfall.
    Test-n-Tune (Nov 23, 2008) - 13.65s @ 98mph

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    155
    yeah but i dont need to worry about that cause my truck is stored from october to march. i just think carbed would be so much easier for me and a lot less work and cheaper cause i got some good holleys sittin on the shelf. and i can rebuild them real fast since both my race cars have holleys.
    http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm122/JMinor00/chevy-1.jpg
    White 1992 C1500 RIP, lost to fire
    Orange 1997 C1500 Autocross truck

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    155
    but what would run the coil packs? would i dtill need the pcm for them cause if i do then f it ill just fuel inject it.
    http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm122/JMinor00/chevy-1.jpg
    White 1992 C1500 RIP, lost to fire
    Orange 1997 C1500 Autocross truck

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts