+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: NA vs. FI Cam

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ona, W.Va.
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by foggy View Post
    Txarkitekt, you have it backwards.114-118 is the wide lsa, 110-113 is a tighter lsa.
    That's what I thought... OK, thanks guys!
    Eric "The" Pyles

    14.06 @ 96mph / 9.02 @ 79mph
    302 RWHP/298 RWTQ


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bentonville Ar.
    Posts
    215
    yes, with a tighter LSA such as 110 or lower is going to be a bit more peaky on your ramp rates. i would always call the company in which who's cam you intend to use and let them know what you have and what you want to do with it. LSM inc is a awesome builder of ls1 type cams. He built alot of our2&6 4&7cylinder firing order swap cams for our dirt cars. He also builds alot for ARCA type racing
    Last edited by dared2k; 04-01-2008 at 11:29 PM. Reason: ..
    just a tow package

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    170
    yea i got a question cuz i want to learn... what advantage does a odd fire cam have over a even fire cam?
    02 Sierra... motorless for now.
    02 SS.. stock bottom 4.8, 241's, 224-220/116+4, 918's and pushrods, front mount turbonetics 78mm, HKS GTII, TiAL, eBoost2, Yank PT3600, Performabuilt 60e, solid motor mounts. Tuned by me with HP Pro and LM2/AFX

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bentonville Ar.
    Posts
    215
    the ls style cams are already set at that firing order. We used ls firing order of the ls based motors on the old sbc motors like the 350 due to them making more torque. some times we would switch 4and 7 cylinders but ls has 4 of the cylinders firing order changed from the old style
    just a tow package

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    9,578
    Oh...I was back-asswards on my assumption of tight versus wide...but I think I am close on whatever else I said...

    2000 ECSB 6.0L
    TORQUER V2 CAM ● COMP 918's ● 7.4 HARDENED PUSHRODS ● K&N SERIES 77 CAI ● 80mm BBK ●PACESETTER LT HEADERS AND 3'' ORY ● SUPER 40 FLOW ● 3000 STALL ● 4.10s ● BUILT 80e ● VORTEC PERFORMANCE TUNE ● MSD 8.5mm PLUG WIRES● ELEC. CUTOUT ● UD & ALT PULLEYS ● FLEX-A-LITE E-FANS ● 22" CENTERLINE STINGRAY III's ● LUND FIBERGLASS TONNEAU ● 2" LEVELING SHACKLES ● 12K HID LOWS & FOGS ● LEDs ● DEBADGED ● WHITE-FACED ESCALADE GAUGES ● KICKER 450.1 ● 2-CVR 10's ● DS60's ● K693's

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by dared2k View Post
    the ls style cams are already set at that firing order. We used ls firing order of the ls based motors on the old sbc motors like the 350 due to them making more torque. some times we would switch 4and 7 cylinders but ls has 4 of the cylinders firing order changed from the old style
    thats pretty niffty... so your telling me a ls is an odd fire?
    02 Sierra... motorless for now.
    02 SS.. stock bottom 4.8, 241's, 224-220/116+4, 918's and pushrods, front mount turbonetics 78mm, HKS GTII, TiAL, eBoost2, Yank PT3600, Performabuilt 60e, solid motor mounts. Tuned by me with HP Pro and LM2/AFX

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by txarkitekt View Post
    Oh...I was back-asswards on my assumption of tight versus wide...but I think I am close on whatever else I said...
    yea you where close man its all gravy
    02 Sierra... motorless for now.
    02 SS.. stock bottom 4.8, 241's, 224-220/116+4, 918's and pushrods, front mount turbonetics 78mm, HKS GTII, TiAL, eBoost2, Yank PT3600, Performabuilt 60e, solid motor mounts. Tuned by me with HP Pro and LM2/AFX

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts